Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37544901›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023

A Brain-To-Brain Mechanism for Social Transmission of Threat Learning.

Yafeng Pan, Mikkel C Vinding, Lei Zhang, Daniel Lundqvist, Andreas Olsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Brain-To-Brain Mechanism for Social Transmission of Threat Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yafeng PanDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-8313
Mikkel C VindingDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-2886
Lei ZhangCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Daniel LundqvistDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden.
Andreas OlssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden.

Funding

Consolidator Grant from the Swedish Research Council 2018-00877Fundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesHumanities and Social Sciences Research Project from Ministry of Education of China 22YJC190017Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation KAW2011.0207Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation KAW2014.0237National Natural Science Foundation of China 62 207 025Stockholm University Brain Imaging Centre SU FV-5.1.2-1035-15Swedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival and adaptation in environments require swift and efficacious learning about what is dangerous. Across species, much of such threat learning is acquired socially, e.g., through the observation of others' ("demonstrators'") defensive behaviors. However, the specific neural mechanisms responsible for the integration of information shared between demonstrators and observers remain largely unknown. This dearth of knowledge is addressed by performing magnetoencephalography (MEG) neuroimaging in demonstrator-observer dyads. A set of stimuli are first shown to a demonstrator whose defensive responses are filmed and later presented to an observer, while neuronal activity is recorded sequentially from both individuals who never interacted directly. These results show that brain-to-brain coupling (BtBC) in the fronto-limbic circuit (including insula, ventromedial, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) within demonstrator-observer dyads predict subsequent expressions of learning in the observer. Importantly, the predictive power of BtBC magnifies when a threat is imminent to the demonstrator. Furthermore, BtBC depends on how observers perceive their social status relative to the demonstrator, likely driven by shared attention and emotion, as bolstered by dyadic pupillary coupling. Taken together, this study describes a brain-to-brain mechanism for social threat learning, involving BtBC, which reflects social relationships and predicts adaptive, learned behaviors.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsLearningBrainHumansbrain-to-brain coupling (BtBC)Magnetoencephalography (MEG)observational threat learningsocial statusvicarious fear

Identifiers

PMID37544901
PMCPMC10558655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.