Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37544479›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer policy2023

Breast and cervical cancer screening practices in nine countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A population-based survey.

Ariana Znaor, Anton Ryzhov, María Lasierra Losada, Andre Carvalho, Vitaly Smelov, Anton Barchuk, Mikhail Valkov, Elena Ten, Diana Andreasyan, Saba Zhizhilashvili and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ariana ZnaorInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. Electronic address: znaora@iarc.who.int.
Anton RyzhovTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine.
María Lasierra LosadaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andre CarvalhoInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Vitaly SmelovWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anton BarchukTampere University, Faculty of Social Sciences/Health Sciences, Tampere, Finland.
Mikhail ValkovArkhangelsk Regional Oncology Centre, Northern State University, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation.
Elena TenScientific and Production Centre for Preventive medicine of the Ministry of Health, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan; International Higher School of Medicine, IUK Academic Consortium, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Diana AndreasyanNational Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Yerevan, Armenia.
Saba ZhizhilashviliTbilisi State Medical University (TSMU), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Zaure DushimovaKazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Lilia D ZhuikovaTomsk Regional Oncology Centre, Russian Federation.
Alla EgorovaSamara Regional Oncology Centre, Russian Federation.
Alesya YaumenenkaN.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus.
Sayde DjanklichNational Cancer Center of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Orest TrilCancer Regional Treatment and Diagnostics Centre, Lviv, Ukraine.
Freddie BrayInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Marilys CorbexWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA) countries have higher cervical and breast cancer mortality rates and later stage at diagnosis compared with the rest of WHO European Region. The aim was to explore current early detection practices including "dispensarization" for breast and cervix cancer in the region.

methodsA questionnaire survey on early detection practices for breast and cervix cancer was sent to collaborators in 11 countries, differentiating services in the primary health setting, and population-based programs. Responses were received from Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Russian Federation (Arkhangelsk, Samara and Tomsk regions), Tajikistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.

resultsAll countries but Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, and the Russian Federation had opportunistic screening by clinical breast exam within "dispensarization" program. Mammography screening programs, commonly starting from age 40, were introduced or piloted in eight of nine countries, organized at national oncology or screening centres in Armenia, Belarus and Georgia, and within primary care in others. Six countries had "dispensarization" program for cervix cancer, mostly starting from the age 18, with smears stained either by Romanowsky-Giemsa alone (Belarus, Tajikistan and Ukraine), or alternating with Papanicolaou (Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation). In parallel, screening programs using Papanicolaou or HPV test were introduced in seven countries and organized within primary care.

conclusionOur study documents that parallel screening systems for both breast and cervix cancers, as well as departures from evidence-based practices are widespread across the EECA. Within the framework of the WHO Initiatives, existing opportunistic screening should be replaced by population-based programs that include quality assurance and control.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAsia, CentralEarly Detection of CancerEurope, EasternFemaleHumansRussiaBreast cancerCentral AsiaCervix cancerEastern EuropeScreening

Identifiers

PMID37544479
PMCPMC10695765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.