Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37544118›Full record

ReviewWater research2023

Reviewing performance of NSF/ANSI 53 certified water filters for lead removal.

Min Tang, Darren Lytle, Riley Achtemeier, Jennifer Tully

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Water research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Min TangOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Fellow at U.S. Environmental Protect Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, Water Infrastructure Division, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States; CDM Smith, 11500 Northlake Dr # 305, Cincinnati, OH 45249, United States.
Darren LytleU.S. Environmental Protect Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, Water Infrastructure Division, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: lytle.darren@epa.gov.
Riley AchtemeierOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Fellow at U.S. Environmental Protect Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, Water Infrastructure Division, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Jennifer TullyU.S. Environmental Protect Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, Water Infrastructure Division, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Properly certified NSF/ANSI 53 water filters are distributed as a temporary measure to protect residents from risk of exposure to elevated lead (Pb) levels resulting from water system changes and various activities. Water consumers and other stakeholders have raised questions on the performance of these filters in field settings, particularly in cases where water Pb levels exceeded the NSF/ANSI 53 challenge water level of 150 µg/L and when Pb phosphate nanoparticles (≤ 200 nm) were present in drinking water. This literature review summarizes findings from 23 studies that evaluated the ability of NSF/ANSI 53 post-2007 certified filters to reduce soluble and/or particulate Pb from water. The studies in total examined 1,486 faucet-mounted, 25 under-the-sink, and 167 pitcher filters, with 1,528 filters used in field studies and 150 filters in laboratory studies. This review found that filter performance varied with different filter type, test water source, and initial unfiltered total Pb concentration. 99% (1,512/1,528) of the filters used in field studies removed Pb to at or below the certification benchmark of pre-2019, 10 µg/L or post-2019, 5 µg/L. In contrast, 61% (91/150) of the filters used in laboratory studies reduced Pb to the benchmark. Laboratory filters were often tested under conditions beyond what they were certified to handle. Pb concentration, particle form and size, improper operation and maintenance of certified water filters were attributed to reported filter failures. This information is intended to help water utilities, regulators, and others make decisions regarding the deployment of water filters to the public when drinking water Pb exposure concerns have been raised.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationFiltrationLeadMineralsDrinking WaterLeadMineralsWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking waterfailure modesLead reductionNSF/ANSI 53 certificationWater filters

Identifiers

PMID37544118
PMCPMC11866865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.