ReviewWater research2023
Reviewing performance of NSF/ANSI 53 certified water filters for lead removal.
Review in Water research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Household Point-of-Use Faucet Filters for Lead Removal: Field Performance and User Experiences.ACS ES&T water · 2025Article
- An evaluation of properly operated NSF/ANSI-53 Pb certified drinking water filters in Benton Harbor, MI.Journal of water and health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Properly certified NSF/ANSI 53 water filters are distributed as a temporary measure to protect residents from risk of exposure to elevated lead (Pb) levels resulting from water system changes and various activities. Water consumers and other stakeholders have raised questions on the performance of these filters in field settings, particularly in cases where water Pb levels exceeded the NSF/ANSI 53 challenge water level of 150 µg/L and when Pb phosphate nanoparticles (≤ 200 nm) were present in drinking water. This literature review summarizes findings from 23 studies that evaluated the ability of NSF/ANSI 53 post-2007 certified filters to reduce soluble and/or particulate Pb from water. The studies in total examined 1,486 faucet-mounted, 25 under-the-sink, and 167 pitcher filters, with 1,528 filters used in field studies and 150 filters in laboratory studies. This review found that filter performance varied with different filter type, test water source, and initial unfiltered total Pb concentration. 99% (1,512/1,528) of the filters used in field studies removed Pb to at or below the certification benchmark of pre-2019, 10 µg/L or post-2019, 5 µg/L. In contrast, 61% (91/150) of the filters used in laboratory studies reduced Pb to the benchmark. Laboratory filters were often tested under conditions beyond what they were certified to handle. Pb concentration, particle form and size, improper operation and maintenance of certified water filters were attributed to reported filter failures. This information is intended to help water utilities, regulators, and others make decisions regarding the deployment of water filters to the public when drinking water Pb exposure concerns have been raised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.