Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37543967›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: review of current classifications and proposal of a novel classification system.

Khuzaima Rangwalla, Anna Filley, Ashraf El Naga, David Gendelberg, Avionna Baldwin, Ali Maziad, Ayush Arora, Aboubacar Wague, Jennifer O'Donnell, Timothy Chryssikos and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Reconsidering flexion-extension imaging: the emerging role of supine MRI and upright radiographs in isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Impact of Lumbar Fusion Internal Fixation on Lumbar Disc Herniation in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Khuzaima RangwallaSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anna FilleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ashraf El NagaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
David GendelbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Avionna BaldwinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ali MaziadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ayush AroraSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aboubacar WagueSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jennifer O'DonnellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Timothy ChryssikosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rafid KasirDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jay ShahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alekos TheologisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lee TanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Praveen MummaneniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Todd AlaminDepartment of Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA.
Sigurd H BervenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Sigurd.Berven@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-0421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review existing classification systems for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), propose a novel classification designed to better address clinically relevant radiographic and clinical features of disease, and determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of this new system for classifying DS.

methodsThe proposed classification system includes four components: 1) segmental dynamic instability, 2) location of spinal stenosis, 3) sagittal alignment, and 4) primary clinical presentation. To establish the reliability of this system, 12 observers graded 10 premarked test cases twice each. Kappa values were calculated to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for each of the four components separately.

resultsInterobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation was 0.94, 0.80, 0.87, and 1.00, respectively. Intraobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation were 0.91, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively.

conclusionThe UCSF DS classification system provides a novel framework for assessing DS based on radiographic and clinical parameters with established implications for surgical treatment. The almost perfect interobserver and intraobserver reliability observed for all components of this system demonstrates that it is simple and easy to use. In clinical practice, this classification may allow subclassification of similar patients into groups that may benefit from distinct treatment strategies, leading to the development of algorithms to help guide selection of an optimal surgical approach. Future work will focus on the clinical validation of this system, with the goal of providing for more evidence-based, standardized approaches to treatment and improved outcomes for patients with DS.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpondylolisthesisHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSpinal StenosisClassification systemDegenerative spondylolisthesisLumbar spinal fusionSagittal balanceSpinal stability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.