Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37543585›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2023

Bacteriophage cocktail application for Campylobacter mitigation - from in vitro to in vivo.

Elisa Peh, Vanessa Szott, Benjamin Reichelt, Anika Friese, Uwe Rösler, Madeleine Plötz, Sophie Kittler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Broad-spectrum phage cocktail targetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Phage-based biocontrol ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bacteriophage Therapy in Companion and Farm Animals.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Phage-Based Biosanitation Strategies for Minimizing PersistentAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  17. Modulation of Caecal Microbiota and Metabolome Profile inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa PehInstitute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany. Elisa.Peh@tiho-hannover.de.
Vanessa SzottInstitute of Food Safety and Food Hygiene, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Benjamin ReicheltInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anika FrieseInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Uwe RöslerInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Madeleine PlötzInstitute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Sophie KittlerInstitute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective strategies are urgently needed to control Campylobacteriosis, one of the most important foodborne gastrointestinal diseases worldwide. Administering bacteriophages (phages) is under evaluation as a possible intervention strategy in primary poultry production to reduce the public health risk of human infection. A major challenge is the translation of results from small-scale animal studies to large broiler flocks. In this study, the in vitro lytic activity of 18 Campylobacter-specific group II phages and 19 group III phages were examined singly, and in different combinations from the same group and from both groups using a planktonic killing assay. Based on these results, a combination of phage NCTC 12,673 (group III) and vB_CcM-LmqsCPL1/1 (group II) was selected for in vivo application in a seeder bird model to study its effectiveness under conditions as close as possible to field conditions. One hundred eighty Ross 308 broiler chickens were divided into a control and a treatment group. Ten days post hatch, seeder birds were orally inoculated with the C. jejuni target strain. Phages were administered via drinking water at a total concentration of 10

resultsCombining group II and group III phages resulted in significantly higher in vitro growth inhibition against the C. jejuni target strain BfR-CA-14,430 than single application or combinations of phages from the same group. The results of the animal trial showed that the application of the two phages significantly reduced Campylobacter counts in cloacal swabs. At necropsy, Campylobacter counts in colonic content of the treatment group were significantly reduced by 2 log

conclusionsWe demonstrated that combining phages of groups II and III results in significantly increased lytic activities. The in vitro results were successfully translated into practical application in a study design close to field conditions, providing new data to apply phages in conventional broiler flocks in the future. Phage application reduced the fecal Campylobacter excretion and Campylobacter concentrations in the colon of broilers.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniFoodborne DiseasesPoultry DiseasesAnimalsChickensHumansPoultryAntibacterialCampylobacterChickenDrinking waterPhage therapyResistanceSusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID37543585
PMCPMC10403930
OpenAlexW4385607389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.