Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37542674›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastroenterology2023

Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial.

Seong Ran Jeon, Soo-Kyung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jae Myung Cha

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05670470 (A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-blinded, Parallel, Multi-center, Phase 3 Trial in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05670470 phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-blinded, Parallel, Multi-center, Phase 3 Trial in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaejoon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled84ConditionsBowel PreparationArmsCTP0303, Orafang Tab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Seong Ran JeonInstitute of Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Soo-Kyung ParkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dong-Hoon YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Myung ChaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. drcha@khu.ac.kr.
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRKyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe use of conventional oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) has gained popularity; nonetheless, they may be not only inconvenient to swallow but also difficult to dissolve. A novel mini-OST has recently been developed to enhance compliance with conventional OST use. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety between mini-OST and conventional OST.

methodsThis was a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, and non-inferior phase 3 trial conducted between September 2022 and December 2022. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compared between mini-OST and conventional OST.

resultsExactly 83 patients were evaluated based on a full analysis set (FAS), whereas 82 patients were evaluated as a per-protocol set (PPS). With respect to the efficacy of preparation, successful and high-quality preparation was excellent in the mini-OST and conventional OST groups on both FAS and PPS analyses, without significant differences between the two groups. On the FAS analysis, the satisfaction and tolerability scores were high in both groups, without significant differences. The first bowel movement after taking the investigational product occurred 30 min earlier in the mini-OST group than in the OST group. Mild, moderate, and severe adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the two groups; however, any AEs were more common in the mini-OST group than in the conventional OST group overall.

conclusionsCompared with conventional OST, the novel mini-OST preparation showed similar efficacy, tolerability, and safety, including mild eight solicited AEs and moderate-to-severe AEs. Clinical trial registration NCT05670470.

Indexed as

CatharticsColonoscopySulfatesAdministration, OralAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodTabletsCatharticsSulfatesTabletsBowel preparationColonoscopyEfficacyMini-oral sulfate tabletOral sulfate tablet

Identifiers

PMID37542674
OpenAlexW4385606886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.