Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37542669›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2023

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for swollen lymph nodes.

Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Thawee Ratanachu-Ek, Eizaburo Ohno, Yoshiki Hirooka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanyaporn ChantarojanasiriDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand. chtunya@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-8696
Thawee Ratanachu-EkRajavithi Digestive Endoscopy Center, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Eizaburo OhnoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University Hospital Cancer Center, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan.
Yoshiki HirookaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University Hospital Cancer Center, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan.
Fujita Health University Hospital · JPRajavithi Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an important tool for the evaluation of lymphadenopathy, especially in intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal regions. EUS also provides tissue diagnosis via EUS fine-needle aspiration or biopsy. To select the target for biopsy or aspiration, conventional B-mode images are used for the evaluation, but this approach still lacks diagnostic accuracy. Contrast-enhanced EUS has been used to evaluate the vascularity of lesions. Most malignant lymphadenopathy shows heterogenous enhancement or defect of enhancement, while quantitative studies using time-intensity curves in contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS show a rapid decline in enhancement pattern. These findings are useful as an auxiliary method for tissue diagnosis or in cases in which tissue diagnosis is contraindicated.

Indexed as

ContrastEndoscopic ultrasoundLymph node

Identifiers

PMID37542669
OpenAlexW4385616408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.