ArticleAIDS and behavior2024
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the PrEP Cascade at Two Veterans Affairs Healthcare Systems.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Literature, 2016 to 2023: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overall, fewer Veterans were eligible for PrEP in 2020, compared to 2019, and 2018 (Maryland Veterans Affairs Health Care System- MVAHCS-: n = 890 (2020), n = 1533 (2019); Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center -DC VAMC- n = 1119 (2020), n = 1716 (2019)). While the proportion of Veterans engaged in PrEP out of those eligible for PrEP increased in 2020 compared to 2019 at both sites (MVAHCS: 5.73% (2020) vs. 3.39% (2019) p-value = 0.006; F = 7.58, and DC VAMC: 15.91% (2020) vs. 9.38% (2019) p-value < 0.001; F = 27.64), the absolute number of Veterans engaged in PrEP remained unchanged (MVAHCS n = 51 (2020) and n = 52 (2019); DC VAMC n = 178 (2020) and n = 161 (2019)). Engagement in PrEP was significantly lower among Black Veterans compared to White Veterans at the DC VAMC across all FY with a widening gap in 2020. Cisgender women were less likely to be engaged in PrEP compared to cisgender men at both sites and throughout all FY with a wider gender gap in 2020. There were no significant differences in retention in PrEP between FY.Anticipated improvements in linkage, engagement, and retention in PrEP in 2020 at the MVAHCS and DC VAMC may not have been seen due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, engagement rates in PrEP remained low overall, particularly among Black Veterans and cisgender women. Novel PrEP delivery models are needed to engage these populations in PrEP following the COVID-19 pandemic. Interactive dashboards and tele-PrEP may have played a big role in sustained retention in PrEP at the VHA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.