Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37542556›Full record

Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with different fixation techniques: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside technique with suspensory cortical buttons. 5-year data from a prospective randomized trial.

Martin Eichinger, Martin Ploner, Gerald Degenhart, Ansgar Rudisch, Vinzenz Smekal, René Attal, Raul Mayr

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01755819 (Clinical Outcome and Tunnel Widening After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01755819 naunknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Outcome and Tunnel Widening After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Computed Tomography - Based Trial Comparing Aperture With Cortical Fixation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University InnsbruckRan2013 to 2016Enrolled60ConditionsACL Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, OutcomeArmsBiocomposite interference screw, Extracortical ACL Tightrope fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Effectiveness of lower tibial tunnel placement combined with internal tension relieving suture in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin EichingerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, a.ö. Bezirkskrankenhaus St. Johann in Tirol, Tirol, Austria.
Martin PlonerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gerald DegenhartDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ansgar RudischDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Vinzenz SmekalAUVA Trauma Center, Klagenfurt, Austria.
René AttalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Feldkirch Academic Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Raul MayrDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. raul.mayr@tirol-kliniken.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8960-0704

Funding

Arthrex GmbH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to examine tunnel widening and clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using two different fixation methods: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside ACLR with suspensory cortical buttons.

methodsTunnel widening was assessed using volumetric and diameter measurements on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans directly after surgery, as well as 6 months and 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed after 5 years with instrumented tibial anteroposterior translation measurement (KT-1000), single-leg hop testing, and the IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores.

resultsAt the final follow-up, the study population consisted of 21 patients, 12 of whom underwent screw fixation and 9 of whom had button fixation. 3 patients with all-inside ACLR had sustained early repeat ruptures within 6 months after surgery and had to be excluded from the further analysis. With screw fixation, the tibial tunnel volume changed significantly more over time compared to all-inside button fixation, with a larger initial increase at 6 months (from postoperative 2.9 ± 0.2 to 3.3 ± 0.2 cm

conclusionTibial tunnels in ACLR with screw fixation were associated with a larger increase in tunnel volume within the first 2 years and a greater decrease up to 5 years after surgery, while femoral tunnel volumes did not differ significantly. On the tibial side, the need for staged revision ACLR may be greater after biodegradable interference screw fixation if repeat ruptures occur, especially within the first 2 years after primary ACLR. Concerns may remain regarding a higher graft failure rate with all-inside ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. RCT CONSORT: NCT01755819.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionBone ScrewsTibiaAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProspective StudiesYoung AdultAll-insideAnterior cruciate ligamentButton fixationScrew fixationTunnel enlargementTunnel widening

Identifiers

PMID37542556
PMCPMC10541822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.