Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37542462›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy

Stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Mesenchymal Stem Cells and induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Diana Clavellina, Wayne Balkan, Joshua M Hare

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. NF-Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diana ClavellinaInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7370-9115
Wayne BalkanInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0405-0489
Joshua M HareInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7751-5032

Funding

ZINC AND CA EDTA THERAPY OF PLUMBISMM01RR000052 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARSH, LAURA · 1985 to 2007
$37.3M
Cellular Cardiomyoplasty for Chronic Heart FailureR01HL084275 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARE, JOSHUA M · 2007 to 2016
$3.8M
Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for endothelial dysfunction in diabetesR01HL134558 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARE, JOSHUA M · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Stem Cells for Dilated CardiomyopathyR01HL110737 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARE, JOSHUA M · 2011 to 2015
$3.2M
Aging impairs stem-cell mediated myocardial repairR01AG025017 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARE, JOSHUA M · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
Autologous Adult Myocardial Cardioblasts to Treat Ischemic Heart FailureP20HL101443 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARE, JOSHUA M · 2010 to 2011
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000052NHLBI NIH HHS P20 HL101443NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084275NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL110737NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134558NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a leading cause of death in the United States. The limited capacity of cardiomyocytes to regenerate and the restricted contractility of scar tissue after AMI are not addressed by current pharmacologic interventions. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach due to their low antigenicity, ease of harvesting, and efficacy and safety in preclinical and clinical studies, despite their low survival and engraftment rates. Other stem cell types, such as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) also show promise, and optimizing cardiac repair requires integrating emerging technologies and strategies. AREAS COVERED: This review offers insights into advancing cell-based therapies for AMI, emphasizing meticulously planned trials with a standardized definition of AMI, for a bench-to-bedside approach. We critically evaluate fundamental studies and clinical trials to provide a comprehensive overview of the advances, limitations and prospects for cell-based therapy in AMI. EXPERT OPINION: MSCs continue to show potential promise for treating AMI and its sequelae, but addressing their low survival and engraftment rates is crucial for clinical success. Integrating emerging technologies such as pluripotent stem cells and conducting well-designed trials will harness the full potential of cell-based therapy in AMI management. Collaborative efforts are vital to developing effective stem cell therapies for AMI patients.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMyocardial InfarctionCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansStem Cell TransplantationAcute myocardial infarctioncardiac repaircell-based therapyexosomesinduced pluripotent stem cellsmesenchymal stem cellsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID37542462
PMCPMC10837765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.