Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37542322›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023

Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis.

Jaime Gillespie, Dannae Arnold, Molly Trammell, Monica Bennett, Christa Ochoa, Simon Driver, Librada Callender, Seema Sikka, Rosemary Dubiel, Chad Swank

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaime GillespieBaylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, 909 N. Washington Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA. Jaime.Gillespie@BSWHealth.org.
Dannae ArnoldBaylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, 909 N. Washington Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Molly TrammellBaylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, 909 N. Washington Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Monica BennettBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, 3434 Live Oak St., Dallas, TX, 75204, USA.
Christa OchoaBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Simon DriverBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, 3434 Live Oak St., Dallas, TX, 75204, USA.
Librada CallenderBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Seema SikkaBaylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, 909 N. Washington Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Rosemary DubielBaylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, 909 N. Washington Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Chad SwankBaylor Scott and White Research Institute and Baylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, 909 N. Washington Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Baylor Medical Center at Garland · USBaylor Scott & White Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverground exoskeleton gait training (OEGT) after neurological injury is safe, feasible, and may yield positive outcomes. However, no recommendations exist for initiation, progression, or termination of OEGT. This retrospective study highlights the clinical use and decision-making of OEGT within the physical therapy plan of care for patients after neurological injury during inpatient rehabilitation.

methodsThe records of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation after stroke, spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury who participated in at least one OEGT session were retrospectively reviewed. Session details were analyzed to illustrate progress and included: "up" time, "walk" time, step count, device assistance required for limb swing, and therapist-determined settings. Surveys were completed by therapists responsible for OEGT sessions to illuminate clinical decision-making.

resultsOn average, patients demonstrated progressive tolerance for OEGT over successive sessions as shown by increasing time upright and walking, step count, and decreased assistance required by the exoskeleton. Therapists place preference on using OEGT with patients with more functional dependency and assess feedback from the patient and device to determine when to change settings. OEGT is terminated when other gait methods yield higher step repetitions or intensities, or to prepare for discharge.

conclusionOur descriptive retrospective data suggests that patients after neurological injury may benefit from OEGT during inpatient rehabilitation. As no guidelines exist, therapists' clinical decisions are currently based on a combination of knowledge of motor recovery and experience. Future efforts should aim to develop evidence-based recommendations to facilitate functional recovery after neurological injury by leveraging OEGT.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceSpinal Cord InjuriesStroke RehabilitationExercise TherapyGaitHumansInpatientsRetrospective StudiesWalkingNeurological rehabilitationPhysical therapyRecovery of functionRehabilitation hospitalRobotic exoskeletonSpinal cord injuriesStrokeTraumatic brain injuryWalking

Identifiers

PMID37542322
PMCPMC10401799
OpenAlexW4385580799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.