Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37542218›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2023

Feasibility and safety of deep sedation with propofol and remifentanil in spontaneous breathing during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an observational prospective study.

Pasquale De Vico, Daniele G Biasucci, Lucia Aversano, Roberto Polidoro, Alessia Zingaro, Francesca Romana Millarelli, Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco, Omero Alessandro Paoluzi, Edoardo Troncone, Giovanni Monteleone and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pasquale De VicoDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, 'Tor Vergata' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Daniele G BiasucciDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, 'Tor Vergata' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Lucia AversanoEmergency Department, 'Tor Vergata' University Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy. aversano.lucia@gmail.com.
Roberto PolidoroEmergency Department, 'Tor Vergata' University Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessia ZingaroEmergency Department, 'Tor Vergata' University Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesca Romana MillarelliEmergency Department, 'Tor Vergata' University Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna Del Vecchio BlancoDepartment of Systems Medicine, 'Tor Vergata' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Omero Alessandro PaoluziDepartment of Systems Medicine, 'Tor Vergata' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Edoardo TronconeDepartment of Systems Medicine, 'Tor Vergata' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni MonteleoneDepartment of Systems Medicine, 'Tor Vergata' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mario DauriDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, 'Tor Vergata' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an interventional procedure that requires deep sedation or general anaesthesia. The purpose of this prospective observational study was to assess the feasibility and safety of deep sedation in ERCP to maintain spontaneous breathing.

methodsThis is a single-centre observational prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary referral university hospital. All consecutive patients who needed sedation or general anaesthesia for ERCP were included from January 2021 to June 2021. Deep sedation was achieved and maintained by continuous infusion of an association of propofol and remifentanil. The primary endpoint was to assess the prevalence of major anaesthesia-related complications, such as arrhythmias, hypotension, gas exchange dysfunction, and vomiting (safety endpoint). Secondary endpoints were: (a) to assess the prevalence of signs of an insufficient level of sedation, such as movement, cough, and hiccups (feasibility endpoint): (b) time needed to achieve the target level of sedation and for recovery from anaesthesia. In order to do so we collect the following parameters: peripheral oxygen saturation, fraction of inspired oxygen, noninvasive systemic blood pressure, heart rate, number of breaths per minute, neurological functions with the use of the bispectral index to determine depth of anaesthesia, and partially exhaustive CO

results114 patients were enroled. Eight patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. We found that all patients were hemodynamically stable: intraoperative mean systolic blood pressure was 139,23 mmHg, mean arterial pressure was on average 106,66 mmHg, mean heart rate was 74,471 bpm. The mean time to achieve the target level of sedation was 63 s, while the mean time for the awakening after having stopped drug infusion was 92 s.

conclusionsDuring ERCP, deep sedation and analgesia using the association of propofol and remifentanil and maintaining spontaneous breathing are safe and feasible, allowing for a safe and quick recovery from anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Deep SedationPropofolCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeFeasibility StudiesHumansHypnotics and SedativesProspective StudiesRemifentanilHypnotics and SedativesPropofolRemifentanilDeep sedationEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyNonoperating room anaesthesiaTotal intravenous anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID37542218
PMCPMC10401822
OpenAlexW4385581923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.