ArticleClinical rheumatology2023
Association between self-reported race and ethnicity and myositis-specific autoantibodies in a diverse cohort of patients with inflammatory myopathy.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interlaboratory comparison of immunoprecipitation-based testing for myositis-specific autoantibodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Editorial: Hunting for inflammation mediators: identifying novel biomarkers for autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are highly specific biomarkers for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). We investigated whether self-reported race and ethnicity were associated with the presence of specific MSAs. Charts of patients with IIM seen at 3 large healthcare systems in the same US city were reviewed. Demographic data and MSA test results were abstracted. Associations between race and ethnicity and presence of MSAs were analyzed using bivariate analysis and further characterized using separate unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models. One hundred twenty-one subjects were included (19% Asian, 10% Black or African American, 27% Latinx or Hispanic, 36% non-Hispanic White, and 7% Other). In a bivariate analysis, anti-Jo-1 and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies were associated with race and ethnicity (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). Black or African American subjects had increased odds of a positive anti-Jo-1 result compared to non-Hispanic White subjects on unadjusted logistic regression analysis (OR 8.61, 95% CI 1.61-46.07), although after adjustment for age and gender this finding was not significant. Subjects categorized as Other had increased odds of a positive anti-MDA5 result compared to non-Hispanic White subjects on both unadjusted (OR 55.0, 95% CI 2.02-1493) and adjusted analyses (OR 44.8, 95% CI 1.55-1298). Anti-Jo-1 and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies were significantly associated with race and ethnicity on bivariate analysis. Black or African American subjects had increased odds of positive anti-Jo-1 autoantibody on unadjusted, but not adjusted, logistic regression analysis. Subjects characterized as Other had increased odds of positive anti-MDA5 autoantibody, although confidence intervals were wide. Key Points • Association found between MSAs and race and ethnicity in diverse US cohort • Anti-Jo-1 and anti-MDA5 associated with race and ethnicity in bivariate analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.