ReviewBritish journal of cancer2023
Interventional pharmacoeconomics for immune checkpoint inhibitors through alternative dosing strategies.
Review in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Eco Friendly and Budget Smart: An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Alternative PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitor Dosing Regimens.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Barriers to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Access for Patients With Cancer in Southeast Asia: Challenges and Policy Implications.JCO global oncology · 2025Article
- De-Escalating Anticancer Treatment: Watch Your Step.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Projected environmental and public health benefits of extended-interval dosing: an analysis of pembrolizumab use in a US national health system.The Lancet. Oncology · 2024Article
- Extending the dosing intervals of nivolumab: model-based simulations in unselected cancer patients.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Killing a fly with a sledgehammer: Atezolizumab exposure in real-world lung cancer patients.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023Observational
- Immune check points in cancer treatment: current challenges and perspectives.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for the treatment of a variety of cancer types. The doses of these drugs, though approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have never been optimised, likely leading to significantly higher doses than required for optimal efficacy. Dose optimisation would hypothetically decrease the risk, severity, and duration of immune-related adverse events, as well as provide an opportunity to reduce costs through interventional pharmacoeconomic strategies such as off-label dose reductions or less frequent dosing. We summarise existing evidence for ICI dose optimisation to advocate for the role of interventional pharmacoeconomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.