Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37541743›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2023

The MIDORA trial: a phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, mechanistic insight and dosage optimisation study of the efficacy and safety of dazodalibep in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Alan Kivitz, Liangwei Wang, Ilias Alevizos, Michele Gunsior, Judith Falloon, Gabor Illei, E William St Clair

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04163991 (A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Mechanistic Insight and Dosage Optimization Study of the Efficacy and Safety of VIB4920 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04163991 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Mechanistic Insight and Dosage Optimization Study of the Efficacy and Safety of VIB4920 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2019 to 2021Enrolled78ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsVIB4920, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Potential new targets for rheumatic diseases.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026
    Review
  4. Emerging Therapeutics in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alan KivitzDepartment of Rheumatology, Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Altoona, Pennsylvania, USA.
Liangwei WangHorizon Therapeutics plc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Ilias AlevizosHorizon Therapeutics plc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Michele GunsiorHorizon Therapeutics plc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Judith FalloonHorizon Therapeutics plc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Gabor IlleiHorizon Therapeutics plc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
E William St ClairDivision of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA stcla003@mc.duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1181-0650
Horizon Therapeutics (United States) · USAltoona Center for Clinical Research · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the safety, efficacy and response duration of four different dosing regimens of dazodalibep (DAZ), a non-antibody biological antagonist of CD40L, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsThis double-blind study included adult patients with moderate-to-severe active RA with a positive test for serum rheumatoid factor and/or anticitrullinated protein antibodies, an inadequate response to methotrexate, other conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors, and no prior treatment with B-cell depleting agents. Eligible participants were randomised equally to five groups receiving intravenous infusions of DAZ or placebo. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score-28 with C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at day 113. Participants were followed through day 309.

resultsThe study randomised 78 eligible participants. The change from baseline in DAS28-CRP (least squares means±SE) at day 113 was significantly greater for all DAZ groups (-1.83±0.28 to -1.90±0.27; p<0.05) relative to PBO (-1.06±0.26); significant reductions in DAS28-CRP were also observed for all DAZ groups at day 309. The distribution of adverse events was generally balanced among DAZ and PBO groups (74% and 63%, respectively). There were four serious adverse events deemed by investigators to be unrelated to study medication.

conclusionsDAZ treatment for all dosage regimens significantly reduced DAS28-CRP at day 113 relative to PBO. The safety data suggest an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. Treatment effects at day 113 and the prolonged duration of responses after DAZ cessation support the use of longer dosing intervals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04163991.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidImmunologic FactorsAdultAntirheumatic AgentsDouble-Blind MethodHumansMethotrexateRheumatoid FactorAntirheumatic AgentsImmunologic FactorsMethotrexateRheumatoid Factorarthritis, rheumatoidpharmacokineticstherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID37541743
PMCPMC10407378
OpenAlexW4385575491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.