Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37541681›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2023

Perceived influence of commercial milk formula labelling on mothers' feeding choices in Great Britain: a qualitative study.

Rana Conway, Isabel Ritchie, Sara Esser, Andrew Steptoe, Andrea D Smith, Clare Llewellyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rana ConwayResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK r.conway@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0955-7107
Isabel RitchieResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sara EsserResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew SteptoeResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andrea D SmithResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Clare LlewellynResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how mothers use commercial milk formula (CMF) labels to inform their feeding choices and explore mothers' understanding of differences between CMF products.

designQualitative study with recruitment via social media. Online semistructured interviews, including a product mapping exercise and thematic analysis.

participantsMothers (n=25) using CMF for children <3 years living in Great Britain (GB).

resultsMothers were drawn to brands they recognised from years of exposure to CMF advertising. CMF products were assumed to vary according to brand and stage, but participants found on-pack information did not explain how. This added to anxiety about choosing 'the best one' and mothers would have liked guidance from healthcare professionals (HCPs). Wide availability of CMF for older infants and children, and on-pack messaging suggesting progression from one product to the next, led many to believe these products were necessary. There was confusion over the appropriate use of specialist products. While mothers rarely mentioned on-pack health and nutrition claims, they were attracted to the overall appearance of packs and messaging relating to science, research and nature. References to breast milk and a logo perceived to represent a breastfeeding mother were taken as indicators of closer similarity to breast milk.

conclusionsCMF legislation in GB should be updated to restrict brand advertising and the use of on-pack text and images that mothers perceive as indicating products have a closer similarity to breast milk. Greater input from HCPs was desired by new mothers and would support them to make more informed choices about CMF.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant FormulaChildFemaleHumansInfantMilk, HumanMothersUnited KingdomChild HealthPaediatricsPsychologyQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37541681
PMCPMC10715500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.