ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2023
National Cancer Institute Collaborative Workshop on Shaping the Landscape of Brain Metastases Research: challenges and recommended priorities.
Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Focused ultrasound for brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Understanding the unmet needs of patients with brain metastases referred for stereotactic radiotherapy and their caregivers: A prospective cohort study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- Intracranial metastases from solid tumors: Call to action and consensus from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology collaborative.Neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical features and prognostic factors of ovarian cancer brain metastases from ovarian cancer: a retrospective multicenter study of 129 cases.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Value of artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology.The Lancet. Digital health · 2025Review
- HIF-1 promotes murine breast cancer brain metastasis by increasing production of integrin β3-containing extracellular vesicles.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Improved Survival and Prognostication in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases: An Update of the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: current principles, expanding indications and opportunities for multidisciplinary care.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Factors associated with local failure after stereotactic radiation to the surgical bed of patients with a single breast cancer metastasis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary management strategies for recurrent brain metastasis after prior radiotherapy: An overview.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Efficacy of 3D-TSE sequence-based radiosurgery in prolonging time to distant intracranial failure: A session-wise analysis in a histology-diverse patient cohort.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Leptomeningeal metastatic disease: new frontiers and future directions.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Return to work in younger patients with brain metastases who survived for 2 years or more.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- "Symptomatic" melanoma brain metastases: A call for clear definitions and adoption of standardized tools.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2024Review
- Targeting fatty acid synthase in preclinical models of TNBC brain metastases synergizes with SN-38 and impairs invasion.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- From pre-clinical to translational brain metastasis research: current challenges and emerging opportunities.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024Review
- Biological Insights and Radiation-Immuno-Oncology Developments in Primary and Secondary Brain Tumors.Cancers · 2024Review
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Fractionated Radiotherapy in the Management of Brain Metastases.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Brain metastases are an increasing global public health concern, even as survival rates improve for patients with metastatic disease. Both metastases and the sequelae of their treatment are key determinants of the inter-related priorities of patient survival, function, and quality of life, mandating a multidimensional approach to clinical care and research. At a virtual National Cancer Institute Workshop in September, 2022, key stakeholders convened to define research priorities to address the crucial areas of unmet need for patients with brain metastases to achieve meaningful advances in patient outcomes. This Policy Review outlines existing knowledge gaps, collaborative opportunities, and specific recommendations regarding consensus priorities and future directions in brain metastases research. Achieving major advances in research will require enhanced coordination between the ongoing efforts of individual organisations and consortia. Importantly, the continual and active engagement of patients and patient advocates will be necessary to ensure that the directionality of all efforts reflects what is most meaningful in the context of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.