ArticleGynecologic oncology2023
Extensive versus focal lymphovascular invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A comprehensive international, multicenter, retrospective clinicopathologic study.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Deep learning feature-based model for predicting lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of bladder using CT images.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in squamous cell carcinoma: mutated PIK3CA as an example.Molecular biomedicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe evaluated clinicopathologic parameters of patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who were treated with initial surgical management and assessed their relation to survival outcomes. Specifically, we evaluated the relation between extent of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and survival outcomes.
methodsAll available tumor slides from patients with initially surgically treated cervical SCC were collected from 10 institutions and retrospectively analyzed. Standard clinicopathological parameters, tumor stroma, and extent of LVI were assessed (focal: <5 spaces, extensive: ≥5 spaces). PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were created to determine prognostic survival-related risk factors.
resultsA total of 670 tumor samples were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 47 years (IQR: 38-60), 457 patients (72%) had a 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I tumor, and 155 tumors (28%) were flat and/or ulcerated. There were 303 nonkeratinizing tumors (51%), 237 keratinizing tumors (40%), and 356 histologic grade 2 tumors (61%). Quantifiable LVI was present in 321 cases (51%; 23% focal and 33% extensive). On multivariable analysis for PFS, extensive and focal LVI had worse outcomes compared to negative LVI (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.26-4.47] and HR: 1.54 [95% CI: 0.76-3.11], respectively; P = 0.02). The difference did not reach statistical significance for OS.
conclusionPresence of LVI is a prognostic marker for patients with cervical SCC. Quantification (extensive vs. focal vs. negative) of LVI may be an important biomarker for oncologic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.