Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540651›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Drip irrigation and sulphur fertilization influenced fodder yield, quality and water use efficiency of groundnut in arid region.

Priyanka Gautam, S R Bhunia, A Sahoo, R K Sawal, Shantanu Rakshit, V K Yadav, B Lal, Ramniwas, Gograj, Rajesh Bishnoi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Priyanka GautamDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, SKRAU, Bikaner, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3924-7911
S R BhuniaDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, SKRAU, Bikaner, India.
A SahooICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Bikaner, India.
R K SawalICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Bikaner, India.
Shantanu RakshitICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Bikaner, India.
V K YadavICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Bikaner, India.
B LalICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Regional Research Centre, Bikaner, India.
RamniwasDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, SKRAU, Bikaner, India.
GograjDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, SKRAU, Bikaner, India.
Rajesh BishnoiICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Regional Research Centre, Bikaner, India.
V S RathoreICAR-Central Arid Zone Research institute, Regional Research Station, Bikaner, India.
National Research Centre on Camel · INSwami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University · INIndian Institute of Pulses Research · INCentral Arid Zone Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Availability of ample and nutritious fodder for livestock is always a challenge in arid region. Choice of crops such as groundnut that can fulfil the requirement of fodder with its crop residues along with human needs can be a viable option to bridge the gap between availability and requirement of fodder. The fodder yield and quality largely depend on soil moisture and nutrient supply especially sulphur (S), a key nutrient for improving groundnut fodder quality. However, no researchers have given emphasis on coupling effect of drip irrigation (DI) and sulphur on fodder yield, quality, digestibility and water use efficiency (WUE). Therefore, the study was conducted to determine the effects of different regimes of DI and S on productivity and quality of fodder. Results revealed that higher regimes of DI i.e. 0.8 +1.0 PE(pan evaporation) and 1.0 PE level of irrigation along with 40 kg S ha-1 significantly improved the yield, primary quality traits (crude protein, ether extract and ash), digestibility indices and significant reduction in Fibers which indicates improvement in quality of fodder. Fodder productivity was 27.0 and 25.6% higher in 1.0 PE and 0.8+1.0 PE level of irrigation, respectively, as compared to 0.6 PE level (lower water regime) of irrigation, although 0.6 PE level of irrigation recorded higher WUE and was at par with 0.8 PE and 0.6 +1.0 PE level of DI. By changing the levels of DI from 1.0 PE to 0.8+1.0 PE, considerable water can be saved without affecting the yield and quality of fodder. Similarly, crop responded to S up to 60 kg ha-1 but at par with 40 kg S ha-1 indicating that application of extra S after 40 kg did not warrant any extra benefit in terms of fodder yield, WUE and quality of fodder. Thus, adjusting the PE levels of DI for water saving and optimal S application can be a sustainable strategy to improve the productivity and quality of groundnut fodder in arid region.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationWaterAnimal FeedBiomassFertilizationHumansWater

Identifiers

PMID37540651
PMCPMC10403097
OpenAlexW4385574969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.