Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540556›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Depth of Radiographic Response and Time to Tumor Regrowth Predicts Overall Survival Following Anti-VEGF Therapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma.

Benjamin M Ellingson, Akifumi Hagiwara, Connor J Morris, Nicholas S Cho, Sonoko Oshima, Francesco Sanvito, Talia C Oughourlian, Donatello Telesca, Catalina Raymond, Lauren E Abrey and 8 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00345163 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Non-Comparative Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Alone or in Combination With Irinotecan for Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme in First or Second Relapse

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenentech, Inc.Ran2006 to 2007Enrolled167ConditionsGlioblastomaArmsbevacizumab, irinotecan
NCT00704288 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2 Study of XL184 in Subjects With Progressive or Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme in First or Second Relapse

TypeinterventionalSponsorExelixisRan2008 to 2012Enrolled222ConditionsGlioblastoma MultiformeArmsXL184
NCT02511405 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Arm, Open-Label, Multi-center Study of VB-111 Combined With Bevacizumab vs. Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorVascular Biogenics Ltd. operating as VBL TherapeuticsRan2015 to 2018Enrolled252ConditionsGlioblastomaArmsVB-111 + bevacizumab, Bevacizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Value of artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology.The Lancet. Digital health · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Benjamin M EllingsonUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-2764-6640
Akifumi Hagiwara *UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5277-3249
Connor J Morris *UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0754-0670
Nicholas S ChoUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8686-0575
Sonoko OshimaUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-3807
Francesco SanvitoUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-9958
Talia C OughourlianUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8133-2928
Donatello TelescaDepartment of Biostatistics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-451X
Catalina RaymondUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2757-439X
Lauren E AbreyF. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0009-0002-2035-2540
Josep GarciaF. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0849-1698
Dana T AftabExelixis, Alameda, California.ORCID 0009-0008-7273-1722
Colin HesselExelixis, Alameda, California.ORCID 0009-0005-8090-8370
Tamar Rachmilewitz MineiVBL Therapeutics, Modi'in, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9906-0884
Dror HaratsVBL Therapeutics, Modi'in, Israel.ORCID 0009-0009-6456-6752
David A NathansonDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4919-9159
Patrick Y WenCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-0774-7700
Timothy F CloughesyUCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8656-7483
APLA Health · USExelixis (United States) · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USVascular Biogenics (Israel) · ILDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM008042 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AJIJOLA, OLUJIMI A, DAWSON, DAVID WAYNE · 1985 to 2023
$29.9M
UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Yvonne Yu-Hsuan Chen · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
Spinal and Cerebral biomarkers for measuring disease progression and prognosis in chronic spinal cord injuryR01NS078494 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ELLINGSON, BENJAMIN M., HOLLY, LANGSTON TYLER · 2012 to 2022
$3.6M
Role of decorin and diffusion MRI in anti-VEGF efficacy for recurrent glioblastomaR01CA270027 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TIMOTHY CLOUGHESY, Benjamin M. Ellingson · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015NCI NIH HHS R01 CA270027NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008042NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAntiangiogenic therapies are known to cause high radiographic response rates due to reduction in vascular permeability resulting in a lower degree of contrast extravasation. In this study, we investigate the prognostic ability for model-derived parameters describing enhancing tumor volumetric dynamics to predict survival in recurrent glioblastoma treated with antiangiogenic therapy. EXPERIMENTAL

designN = 276 patients in two phase II trials were used as training data, including bevacizumab ± irinotecan (NCT00345163) and cabozantinib (NCT00704288), and N = 74 patients in the bevacizumab arm of a phase III trial (NCT02511405) were used for validation. Enhancing volumes were estimated using T1 subtraction maps, and a biexponential model was used to estimate regrowth (g) and regression (d) rates, time to tumor regrowth (TTG), and the depth of response (DpR). Response characteristics were compared to diffusion MR phenotypes previously shown to predict survival.

resultsOptimized thresholds occurred at g = 0.07 months-1 (phase II: HR = 0.2579, P = 5 × 10-20; phase III: HR = 0.2197, P = 5 × 10-5); d = 0.11 months-1 (HR = 0.3365, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.3675, P = 0.0113); TTG = 3.8 months (HR = 0.2702, P = 6 × 10-17; HR = 0.2061, P = 2 × 10-5); and DpR = 11.3% (HR = 0.6326, P = 0.0028; HR = 0.4785, P = 0.0206). Multivariable Cox regression controlling for age and baseline tumor volume confirmed these factors as significant predictors of survival. Patients with a favorable pretreatment diffusion MRI phenotype had a significantly longer TTG and slower regrowth.

conclusionsRecurrent glioblastoma patients with a large, durable radiographic response to antiangiogenic agents have significantly longer survival. This information is useful for interpreting activity of antiangiogenic agents in recurrent glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabHumansIrinotecanMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabIrinotecan

Identifiers

PMID37540556
PMCPMC10592195
OpenAlexW4385563726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.