Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540401›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2023

Cardio-Obstetrics: A Focused Review.

Amrit Misra, Maria Pabon Porras, Aardra Rajendran, Johanna Contreras, Nandita S Scott

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amrit MisraDepartment of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Maria Pabon PorrasDepartment of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Aardra RajendranDepartment of Internal Medicine, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johanna ContrerasDepartment of Cardiology, Division of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Nandita S ScottDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 5B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. NSSCOTT@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of maternal mortality in the USA. All cardiovascular care providers should have a foundational knowledge on the management of pregnant individuals with heart disease. This focused review touches on several key cardio-obstetric themes. RECENT

findingsMany individuals with cardiovascular disease can safely undergo pregnancy, but should have counseling preconception to optimize cardiac status. There are several cardiovascular conditions that are high risk for maternal mortality and morbidity. These individuals should be adequately counseled preconception and offered reliable birth control. The approach to a high-risk pregnant patient with cardiac disease is best managed by a multidisciplinary team to address potential maternal and fetal complications. Identification of at risk individuals can be estimated preconception with several risk scores. The development of risk scores to stratify and identify those at elevated risk during pregnancy is an area of continued research and development.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHeart DiseasesObstetricsPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk FactorsAPO ( adverse pregnancy outcome)Cardio-obstetricsPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.