Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540383›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2023

A comparative analysis of prolotherapy efficacy in patients with knee osteoarthritis across varied dextrose concentrations.

Muhammet Uğur Öztürk, Fatih Baygutalp

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05537077 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Effectiveness of Dextrose Prolotherapy Treatment With Different Concentrations in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurkish League Against RheumatismRan2020 to 2021Enrolled128ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsProlotherapy, Home based exercise program, Hotpack therapy
NCT07243392 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Study on Effects of Steroid, Dextrose Prolotherapy, and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections to Lessen Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorLincoln University CollegeRan2025 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsIntra articular steroid injection, Intra articular PRP, Intra articular dextrose prolotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammet Uğur ÖztürkDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey. ozturk9292@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1049-1259
Fatih BaygutalpDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7344-584X
Atatürk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of prolotherapy with dextrose concentrations of 5%, 10%, and 20% in patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis.

methodsThis study was planned as a prospective, randomized controlled interventional trial. Prolotherapy at 5% dextrose concentration in group 1, 10% in group 2, and 20% in group 3 was applied to the knee intra-articularly and periarticularly at 0, 3, and 6 weeks, and a home exercise program was given. Group 4 received a home exercise program. All groups received hotpack therapy at weeks 0, 3, and 6. Outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee range of motion, timed up and go test, and Short Form-36.

resultsA total of 128 patients were divided into 4 groups. At the 6th and 12th weeks, VAS scores were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 than in group 4 (p < 0.05). At the 12th week, the WOMAC pain score was significantly lower in group 3 than in group 4, and WOMAC physical function and WOMAC total scores were significantly lower in groups 1, 2, and 3 than in group 4 (p < 0.05). Week 6 active and passive knee flexion and week 12 passive knee flexion were significantly higher in group 3 than in group 4 (p < 0.05).

conclusionsAlthough no significant difference was observed among the dextrose prolotherapy groups, higher dextrose concentrations demonstrated a greater improvement compared to the control group. Therefore, the use of 20% dextrose is recommended due to its significant superiority. Long-term follow-up and placebo-controlled studies are needed.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT05537077, registration date: 09.03.2022, retrospectively registered. Key Points • The utilization of dextrose prolotherapy has gained popularity in the management of osteoarthritis, aiming to harness its regenerative and proliferative properties. However, the comparative efficacy of various concentrations of dextrose prolotherapy in treating knee osteoarthritis remains unexplored in the literature. This study aimed to address this gap by comparing different concentrations of dextrose prolotherapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The findings revealed no statistically significant difference among the various concentrations of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis treatment.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeProlotherapyGlucoseHumansPostural BalanceProspective StudiesTime and Motion StudiesGlucoseComplementary therapyExerciseInjectionPain

Identifiers

PMID37540383
OpenAlexW4385563611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.