ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Misexpression Approaches for the Manipulation of Flower Development.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vivo Models of Cardiovascular Disease:Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The generation of dominant gain-of-function mutants through activation tagging is a forward genetic approach that can be applied to study the mechanisms of flower development, complementing the screening of loss-of-function mutants. In addition, the functions of genes of interest can be further analyzed through reverse genetics. A commonly used method is gene overexpression, where ectopic expression can result in an opposite phenotype to that caused by a loss-of-function mutation. When overexpression is detrimental, the misexpression of a gene using tissue-specific promoters can be useful to study spatial-specific function. As flower development is a multistep process, it can be advantageous to control gene expression, or its protein product activity, in a temporal and/or spatial manner. This has been made possible through several inducible promoter systems as well as inducible proteins by constructing chimeric fusions between the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and the protein of interest. The recently introduced CRISPR-Cas9-based platform provides a new way of bioengineering transcriptional regulators in plants. By fusing a catalytically inactive dCas9 with functional activation or repression domains, the CRISPR-Cas9 module can achieve transcriptional activation or repression of endogenous genes. All these methods allow us to genetically manipulate gene expression during flower development. In this chapter, we describe methods to produce the expression constructs, method of screening, and more general applications of the techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.