Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540292›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

A Promising Start and Not a Panacea: ChatGPT's Early Impact and Potential in Medical Science and Biomedical Engineering Research.

Shahab Saquib Sohail

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shahab Saquib SohailDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India. shahabssohail@jamiahamdard.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5944-7371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has catalyzed a revolutionary transformation across various industries, including healthcare. Medical applications of ChatGPT, a powerful language model based on the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) architecture, encompass the creation of conversational agents capable of accessing and generating medical information from multiple sources and formats. This study investigates the research trends of large language models such as ChatGPT, GPT 4, and Google Bard, comparing their publication trends with early COVID-19 research. The findings underscore the current prominence of AI research and its potential implications in biomedical engineering. A search of the Scopus database on July 23, 2023, yielded 1,096 articles related to ChatGPT, with approximately 26% being medical science-related. Keywords related to artificial intelligence, natural language processing (NLP), LLM, and generative AI dominate ChatGPT research, while a focused representation of medical science research emerges, with emphasis on biomedical research and engineering. This analysis serves as a call to action for researchers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to recognize and harness AI's potential in healthcare, particularly in the realm of biomedical research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCOVID-19Artificial IntelligenceBioengineeringBiomedical EngineeringHumansBiomedical engineeringChat GPTGenerative AIGoogle BardLLM

Identifiers

PMID37540292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.