Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540269›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

How can we identify subglottic stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive disease?

Eleftherios Ntouniadakis, Josefin Sundh, Jeanette Söderqvist, Mathias von Beckerath

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mapping quality of life after balloon dilatation in subglottic stenosis using Dyspnea index and Short Form Health Survey-36.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleftherios NtouniadakisDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Södra Grev Rosengatan, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden. eleftherios.ntouniadakis@oru.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-9016
Josefin SundhDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
Jeanette SöderqvistDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
Mathias von BeckerathDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Södra Grev Rosengatan, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

Region Örebro län Örebro County Council (ALF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSubglottic stenosis, a rare condition of the upper airway, is frequently misdiagnosed as obstructive lung disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether subglottic stenosis could be identified and distinguished from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using spirometry or the dyspnea index (DI).

methodsThe study population included 43 patients with asthma, 31 patients with COPD and 50 patients with subglottic stenosis planned to undergo endoscopic intervention. All patients completed the DI and underwent dynamic spirometry registering both inspiratory and expiratory volumes and flows, including the expiratory disproportion index (EDI), the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to peak expiratory flow. One-way analysis of variance assessed the discrepancy of the variables among the study groups, and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis determined the measurement with the best discriminatory power providing a cutoff value, maximizing both sensitivity and specificity.

resultsThe only statistically significant variables differing between all three groups were the EDI and the DI. The EDI showed an excellent area under the ROC curve (0.99, p < 0.001) with a cutoff value of 0.39 (98% sensitivity, 96% specificity), followed by DI (0.87, p < 0.001) with a cutoff score of > 25 (83% sensitivity and 78% specificity).

conclusionIn patients with dyspnea of unknown cause, an increase in EDI should arouse a suspicion of extrathoracic airway obstruction, advocating for further evaluation with laryngotracheoscopy.

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionAsthmaLaryngostenosisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveConstriction, PathologicDyspneaHumansSpirometryAsthmaCOPDDyspnea IndexExpiratory Disproportion IndexFunctional assessmentSubglottic stenosis

Identifiers

PMID37540269
PMCPMC10562276
OpenAlexW4385563722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.