Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540201›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Ionmob: a Python package for prediction of peptide collisional cross-section values.

David Teschner, David Gomez-Zepeda, Arthur Declercq, Mateusz K Łącki, Seymen Avci, Konstantin Bob, Ute Distler, Thomas Michna, Lennart Martens, Stefan Tenzer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TIMSJournal of proteome research · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. ProPept-MT: A Multi-Task Learning Model for Peptide Feature Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David TeschnerInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1755-5382
David Gomez-ZepedaInstitute for Immunology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Arthur DeclercqVIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-1399
Mateusz K ŁąckiInstitute for Immunology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Seymen AvciInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Konstantin BobInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Ute DistlerInstitute for Immunology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Thomas MichnaInstitute for Immunology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Lennart MartensVIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium.
Stefan TenzerInstitute for Immunology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Andreas HildebrandtInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIncluding ion mobility separation (IMS) into mass spectrometry proteomics experiments is useful to improve coverage and throughput. Many IMS devices enable linking experimentally derived mobility of an ion to its collisional cross-section (CCS), a highly reproducible physicochemical property dependent on the ion's mass, charge and conformation in the gas phase. Thus, known peptide ion mobilities can be used to tailor acquisition methods or to refine database search results. The large space of potential peptide sequences, driven also by posttranslational modifications of amino acids, motivates an in silico predictor for peptide CCS. Recent studies explored the general performance of varying machine-learning techniques, however, the workflow engineering part was of secondary importance. For the sake of applicability, such a tool should be generic, data driven, and offer the possibility to be easily adapted to individual workflows for experimental design and data processing.

resultsWe created ionmob, a Python-based framework for data preparation, training, and prediction of collisional cross-section values of peptides. It is easily customizable and includes a set of pretrained, ready-to-use models and preprocessing routines for training and inference. Using a set of ≈21 000 unique phosphorylated peptides and ≈17 000 MHC ligand sequences and charge state pairs, we expand upon the space of peptides that can be integrated into CCS prediction. Lastly, we investigate the applicability of in silico predicted CCS to increase confidence in identified peptides by applying methods of re-scoring and demonstrate that predicted CCS values complement existing predictors for that task. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Python package is available at github: https://github.com/theGreatHerrLebert/ionmob.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPeptidesAmino Acid SequenceIonsMass SpectrometryProteomicsIonsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID37540201
PMCPMC10521631
OpenAlexW4385564265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.