Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540200›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Crohn's & colitis2024

The Diagnostic Utility of Volatile Organic Compounds in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ashwin Krishnamoorthy, Subashini Chandrapalan, Marriam Ahmed, Ramesh P Arasaradnam

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashwin KrishnamoorthyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2480-8664
Subashini ChandrapalanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carshalton, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-3224
Marriam AhmedDepartment of Surgery University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
Ramesh P ArasaradnamDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
University Hospital Coventry · GBEpsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVolatile organic compounds [VOCs] show promise as potential biomarkers of for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, two chronic, idiopathic, gastrointestinal disorders with diagnostic and management challenges. Non-invasive biomarkers aid early diagnosis and management. In this study we review studies of diagnostic accuracy of VOCs in inflammatory bowel disease.

methodsA systematic search was carried out on the Pubmed and Scopus databases; with 16 studies reviewed and meta-analysis carried out on 10.

resultsMeta-analysis of 696 inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] cases against 605 controls revealed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 - 0.92) and 83% [95% CI, 0.73 - 0.90], respectively. Area under the curve [AUC] was 0.92.

conclusionVOCs perform very well as non-invasive biomarkers of IBD, with much scope for future improvement and research.

Indexed as

BiomarkersInflammatory Bowel DiseasesVolatile Organic CompoundsColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseHumansSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersVolatile Organic CompoundsbiomarkersInflammatory bowel diseasevolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID37540200
PMCPMC10896633
OpenAlexW4385563484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.