Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37540098›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2023

Neuronal and Glial Metabolite Abnormalities in Participants With Persistent Neuropsychiatric Symptoms After COVID-19: A Brain Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study.

Thomas Ernst, Meghann C Ryan, Hua-Jun Liang, Justin P Wang, Eric Cunningham, Muhammad G Saleh, Shyamasundaran Kottilil, Linda Chang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long COVID: current research and future directions.Infectious diseases & immunity · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas ErnstDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland.
Meghann C RyanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland.
Hua-Jun LiangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland.
Justin P WangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland.
Eric CunninghamDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland.
Muhammad G SalehDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland.
Shyamasundaran KottililInstitute of Human Virology, Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland.
Linda ChangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Neuroimaging and Behavioral Studies to Assess For Neuroinflammation in COVID-19 During ConvalescenceR21NS121615 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHANG, LINDA, WILSON, ELEANOR M.P. · 2021 to 2021
$425k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS121615NINDS NIH HHS R21-NS121615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to determine whether neurometabolite abnormalities indicating neuroinflammation and neuronal injury are detectable in individuals post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms.

methodsAll participants were studied with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T to assess neurometabolite concentrations (point-resolved spectroscopy, relaxation time/echo time = 3000/30 ms) in frontal white matter (FWM) and anterior cingulate cortex-gray matter (ACC-GM). Participants also completed the National Institutes of Health Toolbox cognition and motor batteries and selected modules from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

resultsFifty-four participants were evaluated: 29 post-COVID-19 (mean ± SD age, 42.4 ± 12.3 years; approximately 8 months from COVID-19 diagnosis; 19 women) and 25 controls (age, 44.1 ± 12.3 years; 14 women). When compared with controls, the post-COVID-19 group had lower total N-acetyl compounds (tNAA; ACC-GM: -5.0%, P = .015; FWM: -4.4%, P = .13), FWM glutamate + glutamine (-9.5%, P = .001), and ACC-GM myo-inositol (-6.2%, P = .024). Additionally, only hospitalized patients post-COVID-19 showed age-related increases in myo-inositol, choline compounds, and total creatine (interaction P = .029 to <.001). Across all participants, lower FWM tNAA and higher ACC-GM myo-inositol predicted poorer performance on several cognitive measures (P = .001-.009), while lower ACC-GM tNAA predicted lower endurance on the 2-minute walk (P = .005).

conclusionsIn participants post-COVID-19 with persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms, the lower-than-normal tNAA and glutamate + glutamine indicate neuronal injury, while the lower-than-normal myo-inositol reflects glial dysfunction, possibly related to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in Post-COVID participants with persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Indexed as

COVID-19GlutamineAdultAspartic AcidBrainCOVID-19 TestingFemaleGlutamatesHumansInositolMiddle AgedProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProtonsAspartic AcidGlutamatesGlutamineInositolProtonsCOVID-19myo-inositolN-acetylaspartateneuropsychiatric symptomsproton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID37540098
PMCPMC10681871
OpenAlexW4385564732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.