Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37539555›Full record

ReviewJournal of global health2023

The utilisation of primary health care system concepts positively impacts the assistance of patients with rare diseases despite limited knowledge and experience by health care professionals: A qualitative synopsis of the evidence including approximately 78 000 individuals.

Raquel Lemos Ferreira, Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento, Victor Izidro Alves de Almeida, Vanuza Regina Lommez de Oliveira, Larissa Gomes Marangne, Flávia Dos Santos Gameleira, Tárcia Regina Coura Dutra, Daniela de Oliveira Santos, Marcelo Pellizzaro Dias Afonso, Paula Eduarda Alves Dos Santos and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nurses' Knowledge of Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Raquel Lemos Ferreira *Faculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento *Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Victor Izidro Alves de AlmeidaFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Vanuza Regina Lommez de OliveiraFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Larissa Gomes MarangneFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Flávia Dos Santos GameleiraLaboratório de Investigação de Pessoas com Doenças Raras (LIRA), Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tárcia Regina Coura DutraFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Daniela de Oliveira SantosFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Marcelo Pellizzaro Dias AfonsoFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Paula Eduarda Alves Dos SantosFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Helian Nunes de OliveiraFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Fernando Machado Vilhena DiasFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Individuals with rare diseases (RD) have been historically understudied. Previous publications reported that existing primary health care (PHC) workforces and associated infrastructure had been shown to improve their access and health-related outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). As current evidence about the impact of PHC on patients diagnosed with RD is yet highly dispersed, this scoping review aimed to collate available evidence of the impact of PHC on patients with RD and summarize published information from multiple stakeholders about the perceived usefulness and barriers to effective use of the PHC system. Methods: We searched Embase, Health System Evidence, PubMed, LILACS / BVS, and The Cochrane Library, from inception to September 1, 2022, for publications providing clear expert- or experience-based insights or data from patients living with RD at the PHC level of care. We included publications highlighting barriers to integrated care of patients with RD, reported by multiple social actors involved in caring for patients with RD. Two investigators screened publications, extracted data, and clustered information among records deemed eligible for inclusion. Data synthesis was performed using narrative and thematic-based analysis. Major findings identified and coded through a semantic-driven analysis were processed in vosViewer software and reported using descriptive statistics. Findings: Eighty publications were included in this review. Quali-quantitative analyses evidenced that the PHC level is essential for approaching patients with RD, mainly due to its longitudinal, multidisciplinary, and coordinated care delivery. In addition, several publications highlighted that the medical curriculum is inappropriate for preparing health care providers to deal with patients presenting unusual signs and symptoms and being diagnosed with RD. PHC teams are essential in orienting patients and families on emergency events. Technology-related concepts were reported in 19 publications, emphasizing their effectiveness on early diagnosis, optimal treatment definition, improvement of quality of life, and long-lasting follow-up. Conclusions: We provided valuable information on the effectiveness of the PHC in fostering a creative, integrative, and supportive environment for patients living with RD. Our results can be helpful to several stakeholders in deciding what actions are still pending to achieve a solid and positive experience for patients with RD in the PHC. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022332347).

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRare DiseasesDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumans

Identifiers

PMID37539555
PMCPMC10401310
OpenAlexW4385564291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.