ArticleCureus2023
Clinical Assessment of Immediate Autotransplantation of Mandibular Third Molars: An In Vivo Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Perspectives in Third Molar Auto-Transplantation: Literature Review and a Case Report of Clinical, Financial and Forensic Implications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Autotransplantation of a Third Molar to Replace an Adjacent Unrestorable Tooth: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransplanting a tooth from one area of the mouth to another is known as autogenous tooth transplantation. It is a great choice for restoring young patients' teeth with developing alveolar bone because it uses the patient's own tooth as the replacement rather than a false one. This study aims to evaluate pain, infection, mobility, resorption, ankylosis, and success rate in the replacement of mandibular non-restorable molars through an immediate autotransplantation of the nonfunctional impacted mandibular third molar. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this in vivo study, 20 patients between the ages of 22 and 50 were selected. The cases in which the first or second mandibular molar was nonrestorable and had an impacted third molar for transplantation were selected. In all the cases, the nonrestorable molar was extracted and replaced with a nonfunctional, impacted third molar. All the cases were evaluated for pain, infection, mobility, ankylosis, and resorption at the postoperative second week, one month, third month, and six months. The pain was assessed on the visual analog scale (VAS), infection was assessed by the presence of purulent discharges, mobility was assessed on a clinical examination of tooth movements, ankylosis was seen radiographically as the obliteration of the periodontal ligament space, and the absence of the lamina dura and resorption were seen radiographically as radiolucency on the root surface. All the readings were tabulated and statistically analyzed.
resultsPain was seen to be maximal at two weeks and minimum at six months. Infection was not seen at all time intervals. Mobility was reduced with time. There was no significant ankylosis or resorption. Out of the 20 cases, four patients required extractions due to resorption and grade 3 mobility. One patient showed ankylosis. The success rate of the autotransplantation was 75%. Fifteen patients showed well-defined lamina dura without ankylosis or resorption.
conclusionAutotransplantation is a valuable tooth replacement option and more economical, especially when provided with proper case selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.