ArticleHeliyon2023
Regional assessments of supraspinatus muscle stiffness in normal adults using shear wave elastography.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional Differences in Muscle and Fascial Tissue Stiffness in the Rectus Femoris Are Dependent Upon Localised Stretching.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Mechanism of Action of Therapeutic Exercise in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: What Does Elastography Add?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring biomechanical differences between brain-first and body-first Parkinson's disease subtypes using shear wave elastography: a pilot cross-sectional study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Normative Data of Supraspinatus Muscle Shear Wave Elastography in Healthy Shoulders: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To provide normal references for regional shear wave elastography assessments of supraspinatus muscle in a population. Methods: Shear wave elastography images of supraspinatus muscles were evaluated on 100 shoulders of 50 normal adults in a fixed position with 30° shoulder abduction both at rest and contraction. Shear wave velocity values and activity values of intramuscular tendon, anterior superficial, anterior deep, posterior superficial, posterior deep, and central subregions were measured. The possible differences in hand dominance, sexes, stratified age groups, and internal muscular-component subregions were discussed. Results: The results showed that shear wave velocity values at rest and activity values differed significantly among supraspinatus muscular-component subregions. Shear wave velocity values at rest were normally highest in posterior deep and lowest in central subregions, whereas activity values were highest in central subregions. The results also showed evaluation of the intramuscular tendon using shear wave elastography to be practicable. The differences in shear wave velocity values at rest between the dominant and nondominant sides were not significant in each subregion, while the values at rest of the majority of subregions were significantly greater in males than in females. Stratified by age groups of 10 years, the shear wave velocity values at rest of some subregions tended to increase with age, with uncorrelations possibly related to insufficient sample sizes and different intensities of limb activities. Conclusions: This study suggested that regional assessments of supraspinatus stiffness using shear wave elastography are feasible, with further research supporting that it can provide information on the surgery, training, and rehabilitation of rotator cuff tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.