ArticleHeliyon2023
The effect of regular nursing rounds on patients' comfort and satisfaction, and violence against nurses in surgical ward.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protected Engagement Time and Related Interventions: A Scoping Review of Experience and Outcomes, and Relevance to the Australian Context.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Occupational violence against nursing staff in the surgical wards of Murzuq locality hospitals, Libya (2024).BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Aggression against Nursing Personnel during the First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Internet-Based Survey.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients' satisfaction and comfort are known as the quality indicators of nursing care. Nowadays, violence against nurses has an increasing trend. Regular nursing rounds are one of the caring programs that help improve these indicators. This study aimed to examine the effect of regular nursing rounds on patients' comfort, satisfaction, and violence against nurses. Materials and methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in two groups consisting of 100 patients and 35 nurses in a surgery ward in the northwest of Iran. The satisfaction with nursing care quality questionnaire, Kolcaba's general comfort questionnaire, and work environment violence were used for data collection. In the present study, the control and intervention groups were selected using a simple sampling method. The control group received routine care only; however, the intervention group received a regular nursing round program every 2 h from the second day of their admission for three days. The satisfaction questionnaire and comfort scale were completed on the second and fifth days of admission, and the evaluation of violence against nurses was performed from the second to the fourth day. The results were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher, independent t, and paired t tests. Results: Before the intervention, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic and dependent variables (p > 0/05). After the intervention, statistically significant differences were observed among the mean scores of satisfaction with nursing care (p < 0/001), comfort (p < 0.001), and violence against nurses (p = 0.041) between the two study groups, so that in the intervention group, the patients' satisfaction and comfort increased and violence against nurses reduced during the intervention period. Conclusions: The use of regular nursing rounds had a positive effect on the study results. Therefore, it is recommended that nurse managers design, implement, encourage, and evaluate regular nursing rounds to improve nursing care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.