ArticleHeliyon2023
A lncRNA-disease association prediction model based on the two-step PU learning and fully connected neural networks.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been shown to play a regulatory role in various processes of human diseases. However, lncRNA experiments are inefficient, time-consuming and highly subjective, so that the number of experimentally verified associations between lncRNA and diseases is limited. In the era of big data, numerous machine learning methods have been proposed to predict the potential association between lncRNA and diseases, but the characteristics of the associated data were seldom explored. In these methods, negative samples are randomly selected for model training and the model is prone to learn the potential positive association error, thus affecting the prediction accuracy. In this paper, we proposed a cyclic optimization model of predicting lncRNA-disease associations (COPTLDA in short). In COPTLDA, the two-step training strategy is adopted to search for the samples with the greater probability of being negative examples from unlabeled samples and the determined samples are treated as negative samples, which are combined together with known positive samples to train the model. The searching and training steps are repeated until the best model is obtained as the final prediction model. In order to evaluate the performance of the model, 30% of the known positive samples are used to calculate the model accuracy and 10% of positive samples are used to calculate the recall rate of the model. The sampling strategy used in this paper can improve the accuracy and the AUC value reaches 0.9348. The results of case studies showed that the model could predict the potential associations between lncRNA and malignant tumors such as colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and breast cancer. The predicted top 20 associated lncRNAs included 10 colorectal cancer lncRNAs, 2 gastric cancer lncRNAs, and 8 breast cancer lncRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.