ArticleHeliyon2023
Simulation education utilizing phantom and angle reference guide in pulmonary nodule CT localization.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current applications and future perspectives of extended reality in radiology.La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Optimizing Precision: A Trajectory Tract Reference Approach to Minimize Complications in CT-Guided Transthoracic Core Biopsy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhancing precision in lung tumor ablation through innovations in CT-guided technique and angle control.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The incidence of sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules has been increasing along with the use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) as a screening tool for early lung cancer detection. In our institution, pulmonary nodule computed tomography-guided localization (PNCL) is performed preoperatively with the laser angle guided assembly (LAGA), an angle reference device. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of postgraduate education in a phantom simulation of PNCL, with or without LAGA. Setting design: This prospective study was conducted in an academic hospital in Taiwan. Seven thoracic surgery residents and three experienced senior physicians were recruited to perform PNCL using a phantom simulation, with or without LAGA, for five nodules each and complete a questionnaire. Performance data were collected. χ Results: The confidence level increased from median 7[range 1, 9] to 8, range [6,9] (p = 0.001) before and after the simulation education course. The scores of enhanced PNCL ability and course satisfaction were as high as 8 [5,9], and 9 [7,9]. LAGA enabled broader puncture angles (with 27.5° [0°,80°]; without 14° [0°, 80°], p = 0.003), a lower puncture frequency (with 1 [1,4]; without 2 [1,5], p < 0.001), and a smaller angle deviation (with 3°[ 0°,8°]; without 5°[ 0°,19°], p = 0.002). Pleural depth in millimeters was associated with increased puncture frequency (0.019[0,010,0.028]) and procedure time (0.071'[ 0.018,0.123']. The PNCL-experienced physicians performed the procedure in less time (-2.854'[-4.646',1.061']. The traverse direction toward the mediastinum diminished the frequency (toward 1[ 1,3]; away 1 [1,5], p = 0.003) and time (toward 7.5'[2',18]'; away 9'[ 3',31'], p = 0.027). The learning curve did not improve procedure performance after ten PNCL simulation rounds. Conclusions: The phantom PNCL simulation education course increased the confidence level, enhanced residents' skill acquisition, and promoted learning satisfaction. The angle reference device helped improve the outcomes of the puncture frequency and reduced angle deviation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.