Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37539155›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy.

Nathaniel Cameron, Lane Fry, Jean-Luc Kabangu, Bryan A Schatmeyer, Christopher Miller, Carol M Ulloa, Utku Uysal, Jennifer J Cheng, Michael J Kinsman, Adam G Rouse and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathaniel CameronDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Lane FryDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Jean-Luc KabanguDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Bryan A SchatmeyerDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Christopher MillerDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Carol M UlloaDept. of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Utku UysalDept. of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Jennifer J ChengDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Michael J KinsmanDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Adam G RouseDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
Patrick LandazuriDept. of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale: Insular epilepsy can be a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping semiology and scalp EEG findings with frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe epilepsies. Stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) provides an opportunity to better localize seizure onset. The possibility of improved localization is balanced by implantation risk in this vascularly rich anatomic region. We review both safety and pre-implantation factors involved in insular electrode placement across four years at an academic medical center. Methods: Presurgical data, operative reports, and invasive EEG summaries were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing invasive epilepsy monitoring on the insula from 2016 through 2019. EEG reports were reviewed to record the presence of insula ictal and interictal involvement. We recorded which presurgical findings suggested insular involvement (insula lesion on MRI, insula changes on PET/SPECT/scalp EEG, characteristic semiology, or history of failed anterior temporal lobectomy). The likelihood of pre-sEEG insular onset was categorized as low suspicion if no presurgical findings were present ("rule out"), moderate suspicion if one finding was present, and high suspicion if two or more findings were present. Results: 76 patients received 189 insular electrodes as part of their implantation strategy for 79 surgical cases. Seven patients (8.9%) had insular ictal onset. One clinically significant complication (left hemiparesis) occurred in a patient with moderate suspicion for insular onset. There were 38 low suspicion cases, 36 moderate suspicion cases, and 5 high suspicion cases for pre-sEEG insula ictal onset. Two low suspicion (5.3%), three moderate suspicion (8.6%), and two high suspicion (40%) cases had insular ictal onset. Conclusions: The insula can safely receive sEEG. Having two or more presurgical factors indicating insular onset is a strong, albeit incomplete, predictor of insular seizure onset. Using pre-implantation clinical findings can offer clinicians predictive value for targeting the insula during invasive EEG monitoring.

Indexed as

Ictal-onsetInsulaSafetysEEG

Identifiers

PMID37539155
PMCPMC10395527
OpenAlexW4384276840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.