Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37539021›Full record

ArticleCardiology plus

All-cause mortality in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients with myocardial injury receiving versus not receiving azvudine: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Ru Chen, Yi Guo, Shan Deng, Jian Wang, Meng Gao, Hongli Han, Lin Wang, Hongwei Jiang, Kai Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology plus. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Real-World Evaluation Study of Azvudine for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ru ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Yi GuoDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Shan DengDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Meng GaoLiyuan Cardiovascular Center, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Hongli HanLiyuan Cardiovascular Center, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Lin WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Hongwei JiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Kai HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Union Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omicron is currently the dominant strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, but little is known about the characteristics and management of omicron related myocardial injury, particularly the potential benefit of the antiviral agent azvudine. Methods: Patients with confirmed and suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to Wuhan Union Hospital from December 7, 2022, to December 30, 2022, were included in this study. Cox regression was conducted to identify risk factors for all-cause mortality. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed at a 1:1 ratio with a caliper of 0.1 pooled standard deviations of relevant confounders. Results: The final analysis included a total of 332 patients (167 confirmed cases and 165 suspected cases), 42.77% (142/332) of the patients were 80 years of age or older and 68.67% (228/332) of them were men, 158 patients were treated with azvudine. In the matched cohort, the total mortality was 30.30% (60/198), 40 (20.20%, 40/198) patients received noninvasive ventilation and 22 (11.11%, 22/198) received invasive ventilation, 34 (17.17%, 34/198) patients were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). The rate of shock, multiple organ damages and arrhythmia were 11.62% (23/198), 20.20% (40/198), and 12.12% (24/198), respectively. There was no significant difference on these clinical outcomes in patients treated with azvudine or not. Azvudine reduced early mortality (within 14 days from admission) (hazard ratio: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.77) even after adjusting for other treatments including glucocorticoids, immunoglobin and anticoagulant therapy, but not the final in-hospital mortality of patients. Conclusions: Patients with COVID-19-related myocardial injury had a high mortality of about 30.30% (60/198). Azvudine improved the early survival of the patients but not final mortality.

Indexed as

AzvudineCOVID-19MortalityMyocardial injury

Identifiers

PMID37539021
PMCPMC10364645
OpenAlexW4380049321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.