Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37538976›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of industrial ergonomics2017

Risk assessment of cheese processing tasks using the Strain Index and OCRA Checklist.

John Rosecrance, Robert Paulsen, Lelia Murgia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of industrial ergonomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CHARACTERIZING PHYSICAL STRAIN IN NON-ROUTINIZED CLINICAL WORK THROUGH OBSERVATION: AN EXAMPLE OF ORAL HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS.Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John RosecranceColorado State University, Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences Department, 1681 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Robert PaulsenColorado State University, Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences Department, 1681 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Lelia MurgiaUniversita' Degli Studi di Sassari, Dipartimento di Agraria, Viale Italia, 39 - 07100 Sassari, Italy.

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH009229NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH008085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct and compare two ergonomic risk assessment methods often used in occupational health research and practice: the Strain Index (SI) and Occupational Repetitive Actions (OCRA) Checklist. Seven raters used the SI and OCRA Checklist to assess task-level physical exposures to the upper extremity of workers performing 21 cheese-manufacturing tasks. Of the total task exposures assessed with both methods, nearly half (49.1%) were classified as hazardous using the OCRA Checklist while 60.2% were classified as hazardous using the SI. Although the underlying injury risk characterization constructs of the SI and OCRA Checklist differ, the results indicated that the SI and OCRA Checklist often classified job tasks into similar risk categories. The differences in risk classifications determined by the SI and OCRA Checklist for job tasks were likely related to the definition of variables measured by these assessment methods as well as the complexity of tasks evaluated. By design, the SI is specific to the distal upper extremity while the OCRA Checklist accounts for the entire upper extremity including the shoulder. When conducting risk assessments of industrial work tasks, the choice of analysis tools should be based on the purpose of the assessment and the complexity of task functions. Both the SI and OCRA Checklist yield risk assessment ratings that are similar for cheese processing tasks.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsMethodological reliabilityPhysical exposure assessmentSemi-quantitative methods

Identifiers

PMID37538976
PMCPMC10398596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.