ArticleCureus2023
The Accuracy of Transcutaneous Bilirubin as a Screening Test in Preterm Infants.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Point-of-Care Bilirubin Testing in Neonates: Comparative Performance of Blood Gas Analysis and Transcutaneous Bilirubinometry.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimal site for applying transcutaneous bilirubinometer as an outpatient screening tool for neonatal jaundice: a comparison between the sternum and forehead.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Demystifying non-invasive approaches for screening jaundice in low resource settings: a review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the accuracy of transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) to predict total serum bilirubin (TSB) in preterm infants across gestational age (GA) ranges and to calculate the cost-effectiveness of TcB as the primary screening test of choice for neonatal jaundice in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) settings.
methodsSingle-center retrospective study of infants aged ≤ seven days admitted to the NICU over a six-month period with a paired TSB and TcB, with or without phototherapy as part of their routine clinical care. Infants were divided into GA-specific groups as term, late preterm, moderate preterm, and very preterm. Measurement bias (bias=TSB-TcB) was calculated on the paired TSB and TcB values, and a Bland-Altman analysis was carried out. The impacts of additional infant-specific variables on the bias were assessed with univariate and multivariate linear regression techniques. The potential direct cost savings associated with the use of TcB as the primary screening test were calculated.
resultsA total of 263 paired TSB and TcB samples from 95 patients were included (130 paired samples from term (n=60), 75 from late preterm (n=21), 27 from moderate preterm (n=7), and 31 from very preterm (n=7)). The mean paired measurement bias across all the GA groups was -0.9 ± 2.9 mg/dL. The sensitivity and specificity of TcB in GA < 35 weeks were 92% and 62%, respectively. A conservative estimate of a one-third reduction in TSB measurement by using TcB as the primary screening test will have a direct cost saving of $3,148 over a six-month period.
conclusionOur data suggest that TcB is a safe and potentially cost-effective screening test for jaundice across GA groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.