ArticleCureus2023
The Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Epicardial Adipose Tissue Thickness in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epicardial adipose tissue as a determinant of heart failure prognosis: insights across ejection fraction phenotypes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Review
- Insights into the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictors for the Length of Stay and Readmission in Chronic Heart Failure Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Using epicardial adipose tissue thickness (EATt) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as individual indicators provides beneficial insight into the prognosis of patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Aim In our study, we aimed to evaluate whether the combined evaluation of NLR and EATt would provide an advantage for identifying high-risk HFpEF patients according to hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD). Method A total of 168 outpatients with HFpEF were retrospectively analyzed. The predictive performance of two inflammatory variables was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic curve and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The patients were stratified into three distinct risk categories based on the established cut-off values for EATt and NLR as follows: Group I, high risk; Group II, middle risk; and Group III, low risk. Results Patients in Group I had the highest risk for HHF and the presence of LVDD (p=0.001 for HHF, p=0.011 for LVDD). Patients in Group I also exhibited more symptomatic and a greater number of comorbidities. In Group I, more structural remodeling (enlarged left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) and left atrial volume index (LAVI)) and associated signs of increased intracardiac pressure (elevated E/A ratio, medial E/e') were observed. Conclusion The results of our study indicate that the use of both EATt and NLR among patients with HFpEF may provide better accuracy in predicting HHF and LVDD compared to the use of either EATt or NLR alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.