ArticleNew directions for evaluation2022
Understanding the context and appreciating the complexity of evaluating the Diversity Program Consortium.
Article in New directions for evaluation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A validation study of mentees' views of mentors' cultural diversity awareness behaviors (CDA race/ethnicity behaviors scale).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Science Self-Efficacy Scale for STEMM Undergraduates.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
- Examining Undergraduates' Intentions to Pursue a Science Career: A Longitudinal Study of a National Biomedical Training Initiative.Education sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluating a National Biomedical Training Program Using QuantCrit: Revealing Disparities in Research Self-efficacy for Women of Color Undergraduates.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Measuring Faculty Mentoring Competency: Establishing the Validity of a Short Form.The chronicle of mentoring & coaching · 2024Article
- BUILDing Engaged Mentors: Examining the Efficacy of BUILD-led Mentor Training.The chronicle of mentoring & coaching · 2024Article
- Research, Science Identity, and Intent to Pursue a Science Career: A BUILD Intervention Evaluation at CSULB.Education sciences · 2024Article
- Investigating the relationship between participation in the building infrastructure leading to diversity (BUILD) initiative and intent to pursue a science career: A cross-sectional analysis.Evaluation and program planning · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) made a sizeable investment in developing a scientific approach to understanding how to best increase diversity in the NIH-funded workforce by fostering inclusive excellence at a national scale through the Diversity Program Consortium (DPC). This chapter provides an overview of the context in which the consortium-wide evaluation study has taken place to provide readers with an understanding of its level of complexity. This evaluation effort is the first large-scale, national, systemic, longitudinal evaluation of harmonized interventions focused on undergraduate biomedical research training programs in the history of the NIH and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.