Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37538870›Full record

ArticleJournal of health science & education2018

Increasing Obesity Prevalence in the United States End-Stage Renal Disease Population.

B A Shelton, R D Reed, P A MacLennan, D McWilliams, M N Mustian, D Sawinski, V Kumar, S Ong, J E Locke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health science & education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B A SheltonComprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
R D ReedComprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
P A MacLennanComprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
D McWilliamsComprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
M N MustianComprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
D SawinskiRenal, Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
V KumarComprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
S OngComprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
J E LockeComprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

Funding

CKD Risk Prediction among Obese Living Kidney DonorsR01DK113980 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LOCKE, JAYME ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Long-term outcomes among living kidney donors with isolated medical abnormalitiesK23DK103918 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LOCKE, JAYME ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2019
$899k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK103918NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Among ESRD patients, obesity may improve dialysis-survival but decreases likelihood of transplantation, and as such, obesity prevalence may directly affect growth of the dialysis population. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess BMI trends in the ESRD population as compared to the general population. Materials and Methods: Incident adult ESRD patients were identified from the United States Renal Data System from 01/01/1995-12/31/2010 (n=1,458,350). Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n=4,303,471) represented the US population. Trends in BMI, obesity classes I (BMI of 30-34.9), II (BMI of 35-39.9), and III (BMI ≥ 40), were examined by year of dialysis initiation. Trends in BMI slope were compared between the ESRD and US populations using linear regression. Results: Mean BMI of ESRD patients in 1995 was 25.2 as compared to 29.4 in 2010, a 16.7% increase, while the US population's mean BMI increased from 25.3 to 27.2, a 7.5% increase. BMI increase among the ESRD population was significantly more rapid than among the US population (β: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.14-0.18, p<0.001). Conclusions and Recommendations: Mean BMI among the ESRD population is increasing more rapidly than the US population. Given decreased access to kidney transplantation among ESRD patients with obesity, future research should be directed at controlling healthcare expenditures by identifying strategies to address the obesity epidemic among the US ESRD population.

Indexed as

DialysisEnd-stage renal diseaseObesity

Identifiers

PMID37538870
PMCPMC10398833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.