Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37538806›Full record

ArticleActa naturae

Cell Therapy: A New Technology for Cerebral Circulation Restoration after Ischemia/Reperfusion.

I B Sokolova, O P Gorshkova

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I B SokolovaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russian Federation.
O P GorshkovaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russian Federation.
Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapy with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be a promising technique for cerebral blood flow restoration after transient ischemia. Before a practical application of the cell material, 7-9 days are required for its cultivation. We studied the efficacy of human MSC (hMSC) transplantation performed 7 days after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) to help recover cerebral circulation. The intravital micrograph technique was used to comparatively evaluate the vasculature density in the pia mater and the reactivity of the pial arteries in response to acetylcholine (ACh) in rats after I/R (clamping of both carotid arteries and a simultaneous decrease in and strict maintenance of the mean BP at 45 ± 2 mm Hg for 12 min) and with/without hMSC transplantation. Perfusion (P) in the sensorimotor cortex was assessed using laser dopplerography. After 14 and 21 days, the vasculature density in I/R-affected rats was 1.2- to 1.4-fold and 1.2- to 1.3-fold lower, respectively, than that in the controls. The number of ACh-dilated arteries decreased 1.6- to 1.9-fold and 1.2- to 1.7-fold 14 and 21 days after I/R, respectively. After 21 days, the P level decreased 1.6-fold, on average. Administration of hMSCs on day 7 after I/R resulted in complete recovery of the vasculature density by day 14. ACh-mediated dilatation fully recovered only in arteries of less than 40 μm in diameter within 21 days. After 21 days, the P level was 1.2-fold lower than that in the controls but significantly higher than that in rats after I/R without hMSCs. Delayed administration of MSCs after a transient cerebral ischemic attack affords the time for the procedures required to prepare cell material for transplantation and provides a good therapeutic response in the pial microvasculature.

Indexed as

brainintravenous transplantationischemia/reperfusionmesenchymal stem cellsmicrovascular densityperfusionreactivity

Identifiers

PMID37538806
PMCPMC10395779
OpenAlexW4385555363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.