ArticleKidney medicine2023
Follow-up Care of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Cohort Study.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Prevention and treatment of long-term sequelae in critically ill patients-the responsibility of intensive care medicine].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Pooled it
- Optimizing Proteinuria Evaluation and Management after Acute Kidney Injury: Insights from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study.Kidney360 · 2026Article
- Association of Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Social Determinants of Health with Post-Hospitalization Acute Kidney Injury Care.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Proteinuria Assessment After Acute Kidney Injury Among US Veterans.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- The burden of acute kidney disease: an epidemiological review and importance of follow-up care.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- Self-Reported Burden and Health-Related Quality of Life in Acute Kidney Injury Survivors Compared with Patients with Advanced CKD.Kidney360 · 2025Article
- Care That Fits: Optimizing Value-Based Care for Acute Kidney Injury Survivors.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2025Review
- Acute Kidney Injury Provider and Survivor Education: Current and Emerging Tools.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2025Review
- Primary Care Providers Barriers, Comfort and Awareness in Follow-up Care of Acute Kidney Injury Patients: A Comprehensive Survey on Current Practices.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: To evaluate follow-up care of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with AKI in Alberta, Canada from 2005 to 2018, who survived to discharge without kidney replacement therapy or estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m Exposure: AKI (defined as ≥50% or ≥0.3 mg/dL serum creatinine increase). Outcomes: The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of an outpatient serum creatinine and urine protein measurement at 3 months postdischarge. Secondary outcomes included an outpatient serum creatinine or urine protein measurement or a nephrologist visit at 3 months postdischarge. Analytical Approach: Patients were followed from hospital discharge until the first of each outcome of interest, death, emigration from the province, kidney replacement therapy (maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation), or end of study period (March 2019). We used non-parametric methods (Aalen-Johansen) to estimate the cumulative incidence functions of outcomes accounting for competing events (death and kidney replacement therapy). Results: There were 29,732 critically ill adult patients with AKI. The median age was 68 years (IQR, 57-77), 39% were female, and the median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 72 mL/min/1.73 m Limitations: We lacked granular data, such as urine output. Conclusions: Many critically ill patients with AKI do not receive the recommended follow-up care. Our findings highlight a gap in the transition of care for survivors of critical illness and AKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.