Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37538346›Full record

ArticleJournal for the measurement of physical behaviour2022

Validation of Body-Worn Sensors for Gait Analysis During a 2-min Walk Test in Children.

Vincent Shieh, Cris Zampieri, Ashwini Sansare, John Collins, Thomas C Bulea, Minal Jain

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gait Event Detection From Thigh Segment Kinematics in Children With Crouch Gait.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent ShiehRehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2290-3676
Cris ZampieriRehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ashwini SansareDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
John CollinsRehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Thomas C BuleaRehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Minal JainRehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Instrumented gait mat systems have been regarded as one of the gold standard methods for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters. However, their portable walkways confine walking to a restricted area and limit the number of gait cycles collected. Wearable inertial sensors are a potential alternative that allow more natural walking behavior and have fewer space restrictions. The objective of this pilot study was to establish the concurrent validity of body-worn sensors against the portable walkway system in older children. Methods: Twenty-one participants (10 males) 7-17 years old performed 2-min walk tests at a self-selected and fast pace in a 25-m-long hallway, while wearing three inertial sensors. Data collection were synchronized between devices and the portions of the walk when subjects passed on the walkway were used to compare gait speed, stride length, gait cycle duration, cadence, and double support time. Regression models and Bland-Altman analysis were completed to determine agreement between systems for the selected gait parameters. Results: Gait speed, cadence, gait cycle duration, and stride length as measured by inertial sensors demonstrated strong agreement overall. Double support time was found to have lower validity due to a combined bias of age, height, weight, and walking pace. Conclusion: These results support the validity of wearable inertial sensors in measuring gait speed, cadence, gait cycle duration, and stride length in children 7 years old and above during a 2-min walking test. Future studies are warranted with a broader age range to thoroughly represent the pediatric population.

Indexed as

accelerometerpediatricswearable technology

Identifiers

PMID37538346
PMCPMC10398795
OpenAlexW4285134965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.