ArticleSkin health and disease2023
Effectiveness of 0.1% mometasone furoate under hydrocolloid dressing versus 0.1% mometasone furoate in patients with lichen simplex chronicus.
Article in Skin health and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lichen Simplex Chronicus: Clinical Perspectives and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of 0.1% mometasone furoate under hydrocolloid dressing versus 0.1% mometasone furoate in patients with lichen simplex chronicus.Skin health and disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There was a lack of high-quality, evidence-based treatment for lichen simplex chronicus (LSC). Topical steroid under hydrocolloid dressing treatment was investigated mostly in observational studies without investigation of the cost-effectiveness and the methodology of application also varied without standardisation. To investigate the cost-effectiveness of topical steroid under hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of moderate to severe lichen simplex chronicus (LSC). The study aimed to provide a clear methodology that was replicable. A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was carried out to compare the efficacy of 0.1% mometasone furoate cream with or without hydrocolloid dressing in patients suffering from moderate to severe LSC. Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) individual components score were assessed by a Dermatologist through clinical photos at week 0, 2, and 4. Pruritis Numerical Rating Scale (PNRS) was rated. Forty adult patients were recruited. The group with hydrocolloid dressing showed superior treatment efficacy. 20 out of 20 patients benefited from the hydrocolloid dressing with topical steroid while only 6 out of 20 patients benefited from topical steroid alone at week 2 regarding PGA. Similar result was obtained at week 4. Extra HK$ 132 was needed for each patient in hydrocolloid with topical steroid group. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.42-1.44) at week 2 and 1.42 (95% CI: 1.41-1.44) at week 4 regarding PGA score improvement of ≥2. NNT analysis supported the cost-effectiveness of adjunctive hydrocolloid dressing usage as the first-line treatment in patients with moderate to severe LSC. This study added evidence to LSC treatment with a detailed and reproducible methodology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.