ArticleAvicenna journal of medical biotechnology
Application of Menstrual Blood Derived Stromal (stem) Cells Exert Greater Regenerative Potency Than Fibroblasts/Keratinocytes in Chronic Wounds of Diabetic Mice.
Article in Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Compositions of Cell-Based Therapies for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Treatment: A Review of Clinical Studies.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Current application of tissue-engineered dermal scaffolds mimicking the extracellular matrix microenvironment in wound healing.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study we differentially showed the effects of cell-seeded bilayer scaffold wound dressing in accelerating healing process in diabetic ulcers that still remains as a major clinical challenge. The aim of the study was to compare immunomodulatory and angiogenic activity, and regenerative effect differences between Menstrual blood-derived Stem Cells (MenSCs) and foreskin-derived keratinocytes/fibroblasts. Methods: The streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice model was developed in male C57/BL6 mice. A bilayer scaffold was fabricated by electrospining silk fibroin nano-fibers on human Amniotic Membrane (AM). Dermal fibroblasts and keratinocyte isolated from neonatal foreskin and MenSCs were isolated from the menstrual blood of healthy women. The diabetic mice were randomly divided into three groups including no treatment group, fibroblast/keratinocyte-seeded bilayer scaffold group (bSC+FK), and MenSCs-seeded bilayer scaffold group. The healing of full-thickness excisional wounds evaluations in the diabetic mice model in each group were evaluated at 3, 7, and 14 days after treatment. Results: The gross and histological data sets significantly showed wound healing promotion Conclusion: Healing symptoms in wounds dressed with keratinocyte/fibroblast-seeded bilayer scaffold was significantly lower than MenSCs-seeded bilayer scaffold done on impaired diabetic wound chronicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.