ReviewAsian journal of urology2023
Radiation protection measures during endourological therapies.
Review in Asian journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiation exposure of urologists during endourological procedures: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Estimating Radiation Dose and Proposing Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Fluoroscopy of Micturating Cystourethrogram:Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Tips and tricks for reducing radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery: A literature review by the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology.Asian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Protective role of sodium propionate against glycerol or fractionated doses of gamma rays-induced acute kidney injury via ATF5-induced mitophagy in rats.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Radiation Exposure, Knowledge, and Compliance in Upper Tract Urological Surgery: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Radiation exposure in flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath: A European Association of Urology-Endourology multicenter study.Asian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Radiation-free ureteroscopy: risky business or a safe alternative?Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Real time eye dose reduction in fluoroscopy with auditory and visual feedback dosimeter through swine model experiments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Real-Time Dosimetry in Endourology: Tracking Staff Radiation Risks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Holmium and Thulium Fiber Laser Safety in Endourological Practice: What Does the Clinician Need to Know?Current urology reports · 2023Review
- Controversies in ureteroscopy: lasers, scopes, ureteral access sheaths, practice patterns and beyond.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal.Research and reports in urology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this narrative review was to search the existing literature for studies reporting measures to minimize radiation use during endoscopic management of stone disease and present ways of reducing the exposure of both patients and operating room staff. Methods: A literature review in PubMed was performed to identify studies describing protocols or measures to reduce radiation received during endourological procedures from January 1970 to August 2022. Eligible studies were those that reported outcomes for ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotripsy regarding measures to minimize radiation doses used intraoperatively, performed either in real-life theatres or using phantoms. Both comparative and non-comparative studies were deemed eligible. Results: Protection can be achieved initially at the level of diagnosis and follow-up of patients, which should be done following an algorithm and choice of more conservative imaging methods. Certain protocols, which follow principles for minimized fluoroscopy use should be implemented and urologists as well as operating room staff should be continuously trained regarding radiation damage and protection measures. Wearing protective lead equipment remains a cornerstone for personnel protection, while configuration of the operating room and adjusting X-ray machine settings can also significantly reduce radiation energy. Conclusion: There are specific measures, which can be implemented to reduce radiation exposure. These include avoiding excessive use of computed tomography scans and X-rays during diagnosis and follow-up of urolithiasis patients. Intraoperative protocols with minimal fluoroscopy use can be employed. Staff training regarding dangers of radiation plays also a major role. Use and maintenance of protective equipment and setting up the operating room properly also serve towards this goal. Machine settings can be customized appropriately and finally continuously monitoring of exposure with dosimeters can be adopted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.