Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37538154›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2023

Radiation protection measures during endourological therapies.

Lazaros Tzelves, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Ioannis Manolitsis, Themistoklis Bellos, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Marinos Berdempes, Titos Markopoulos, Michael Lardas, Belthangady M Zeeshan Hameed, Panagiotis Angelopoulos and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal.Research and reports in urology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lazaros Tzelves2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Patrick Juliebø-JonesYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Ioannis Manolitsis2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Themistoklis Bellos2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ioannis MykoniatisYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Marinos Berdempes2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Titos Markopoulos2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Michael Lardas2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Belthangady M Zeeshan HameedYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Panagiotis Angelopoulos2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Amelia PietropaoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Bhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Ioannis Varkarakis2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Andreas Skolarikos2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this narrative review was to search the existing literature for studies reporting measures to minimize radiation use during endoscopic management of stone disease and present ways of reducing the exposure of both patients and operating room staff. Methods: A literature review in PubMed was performed to identify studies describing protocols or measures to reduce radiation received during endourological procedures from January 1970 to August 2022. Eligible studies were those that reported outcomes for ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotripsy regarding measures to minimize radiation doses used intraoperatively, performed either in real-life theatres or using phantoms. Both comparative and non-comparative studies were deemed eligible. Results: Protection can be achieved initially at the level of diagnosis and follow-up of patients, which should be done following an algorithm and choice of more conservative imaging methods. Certain protocols, which follow principles for minimized fluoroscopy use should be implemented and urologists as well as operating room staff should be continuously trained regarding radiation damage and protection measures. Wearing protective lead equipment remains a cornerstone for personnel protection, while configuration of the operating room and adjusting X-ray machine settings can also significantly reduce radiation energy. Conclusion: There are specific measures, which can be implemented to reduce radiation exposure. These include avoiding excessive use of computed tomography scans and X-rays during diagnosis and follow-up of urolithiasis patients. Intraoperative protocols with minimal fluoroscopy use can be employed. Staff training regarding dangers of radiation plays also a major role. Use and maintenance of protective equipment and setting up the operating room properly also serve towards this goal. Machine settings can be customized appropriately and finally continuously monitoring of exposure with dosimeters can be adopted.

Indexed as

As low as reasonably achievableEndourologyFluoroless ureteroscopyPercutaneous nephrolithotripsyRadiation

Identifiers

PMID37538154
PMCPMC10394289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.