ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2023
Artificial intelligence modelling to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease in oncology patients.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular risk-prediction models in cancer survivors: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiovascular Risk Stratification and Surveillance in Cardio-Oncology: Mechanistic Foundations and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Imaging for the Early Detection of Cardiotoxicity from Emerging Cancer Therapies: Mechanistic Insights Across the Pediatric and Adult Spectrum.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Research Priorities and Future Directions in Cardio-Oncology.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Leveraging AI to Enhance Electronic Health Records.EJIFCC · 2025Review
- Applications, challenges and future directions of artificial intelligence in cardio-oncology.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Precision Medicine in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2025Review
- AI and Smart Devices in Cardio-Oncology: Advancements in Cardiotoxicity Prediction and Cardiovascular Monitoring.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardio-Oncology: A Comprehensive Review.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence: Applications in cardio-oncology and potential impact on racial disparities.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Advancing Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Machine Learning Models With Psychological Factors.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic and Machine Learning-Based Classification of Unprovoked Versus Provoked Venous Thromboembolism Using Public Data.IET systems biologyArticle
- Machine learning in predicting treatment response and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: There are no comprehensive machine learning (ML) tools used by oncologists to assist with risk identification and referrals to cardio-oncology. This study applies ML algorithms to identify oncology patients at risk for cardiovascular disease for referrals to cardio-oncology and to generate risk scores to support quality of care. Methods and results: De-identified patient data were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Patients with breast, kidney, and B-cell lymphoma cancers were targeted. Additionally, the study included patients who received immunotherapy drugs for treatment of melanoma, lung cancer, or kidney cancer. Random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) ML models were applied to analyse each cohort: A total of 20 023 records were analysed (breast cancer, 6299; B-cell lymphoma, 9227; kidney cancer, 2047; and immunotherapy for three covered cancers, 2450). Data were divided randomly into training (80%) and test (20%) data sets. Random forest and ANN performed over 90% for accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). All ANN models performed better than RF models and produced accurate referrals. Conclusion: Predictive models are ready for translation into oncology practice to identify and care for patients who are at risk of cardiovascular disease. The models are being integrated with electronic health record application as a report of patients who should be referred to cardio-oncology for monitoring and/or tailored treatments. Models operationally support cardio-oncology practice. Limited validation identified 86% of the lymphoma and 58% of the kidney cancer patients with major risk for cardiotoxicity who were not referred to cardio-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.