ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2023
Comparative Bending Strength of Metacarpal Neck Fractures Fixed with Two Types of Intramedullary Screws.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Intramedullary (IM) screw fixation of metacarpal fractures is a technique, which has gained in popularity owing to its simplicity, speedy rehabilitation, and good functional outcomes. A new, larger diameter, non-compression screw designed specifically for IM metacarpal fixation was recently introduced which could provide better fracture stability and reduce the risk of hardware failure. Our goal was to evaluate the strength of this screw compared to a first-generation screw. Methods: This mechanical study was designed to compare a 4.5 mm metacarpal headless screw (MCHS) to data from our prior research evaluating a 3.0 mm headless screw (HS). Accordingly, we used identical bone models, testing constructs, equipment, and protocols. A metacarpal neck osteotomy was created in 10 Sawbones models. A 4.5 mm x 50 mm MCHS was inserted retrograde to stabilize the fracture. Flexion bending strength was measured through a cable tension construct on a materials testing machine. Failure mechanism and strength was recorded and compared to data with a 3.0 mm screw construct. Results: Eight models failed by bending of the intramedullary screw. Two models failed by rotation of the metacarpal head. Failure occurred at an average of 539 N (Range 315 - 735 N). The MCHS demonstrated a significantly greater load to failure compared to the previously studied 3.0 mm HS at 215 N ( Conclusion: A larger, 4.5 mm metacarpal-specific headless screw is more than twice as strong as a 3.0 mm diameter screw in a metacarpal neck fracture model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.