Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37538069›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2023

Breathing, Obstruction, Restriction, and Gas Exchange: A Pulmonary Function Testing Interpretation Framework for Novice Learners.

Ryan E Nelson, Jeremy B Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan E NelsonSection of Hospital Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-1185
Jeremy B RichardsHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-1955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary function testing (PFT) is a common method of assessing patients with respiratory symptoms, yet exposure to PFT is variable throughout medical training. Therefore, incorporating a dedicated approach to teaching PFT into the formal medical education curriculum can ensure that trainees become familiar with both the relevant physiologic principles involved in interpreting PFT results and the indications for performing PFT in clinical practice. In this "How I Teach" article, we present breathing, obstruction, restriction, and gas exchange (BORG), a novel, small-group workshop designed to teach novice learners a sequential framework for PFT interpretation. The BORG workshop comprises two segments: a whiteboard minilecture that illustrates the BORG framework and a case-based worksheet whereby learners apply this approach to sets of PFTs with increasing difficulty. Our workshop is grounded in two cognitive psychology frameworks: the cognitive theory of multimedia learning and the dual-process theory. We provide three figures and four supplementary videos to illustrate our workshop's design and delivery, as well as both learner and instructor versions of our BORG worksheet. Last, we address three PFT concepts that have challenged us as instructors and provide evidence-based teaching scripts. The BORG workshop can be used by medical educators working with medical students and residents as a means of helping learners progress along the continuum from a basic understanding of spirometry to independent analysis and interpretation of PFTs to application of PFT results to medical decision making.

Identifiers

PMID37538069
PMCPMC10394713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.